[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1410},["ShallowReactive",2],{"active-banner":3,"navbar-featured-partner-blog":23,"navbar-pricing-featured":304,"blog-\u002Fblog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar":1084,"blog-authors-\u002Fblog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar":1344,"related-\u002Fblog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar":1392},{"id":4,"title":5,"date":6,"dismissible":7,"extension":8,"link":9,"link2":10,"linkText":11,"linkText2":10,"meta":12,"stem":20,"variant":21,"__hash__":22},"banners\u002Fbanners\u002Fkafka-company-2025.md","Native Apache Kafka Service Is Coming Soon to StreamNative Cloud. Join the waitlist and get $1,000 in credits.","2026-04-01",true,"md","\u002Fnative-kafka-service-waitlist",null,"Join Waitlist",{"body":13},{"type":14,"value":15,"toc":16},"minimark",[],{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":19},"",2,[],"banners\u002Fkafka-company-2025","default","IMIJszQOOWTfA_DV33eYUA5jqV7DrX1FWbBTBZfNvWc",{"id":24,"title":25,"authors":26,"body":28,"category":288,"createdAt":10,"date":289,"description":290,"extension":8,"featured":7,"image":291,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":293,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":295,"readingTime":296,"relatedResources":10,"seo":297,"stem":298,"tags":299,"__hash__":303},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025.md","StreamNative Recognized as a Contender in The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",[27],"David Kjerrumgaard",{"type":14,"value":29,"toc":275},[30,38,46,50,66,72,77,80,86,101,108,114,117,123,126,133,139,142,145,156,162,168,171,174,177,183,190,193,196,203,206,209,223,228,232,236,240,244,248,250,267,269],[31,32,34],"h3",{"id":33},"receives-highest-possible-scores-in-both-the-messaging-and-resource-optimization-criteria",[35,36,37],"em",{},"Receives Highest Possible Scores in BOTH the Messaging and Resource Optimization Criteria",[39,40,42],"h2",{"id":41},"introduction",[43,44,45],"strong",{},"Introduction",[47,48,49],"p",{},"Real-time data has become the backbone of modern innovation. As artificial intelligence (AI) and digital services demand instantaneous insights, organizations are realizing that streaming data is no longer optional – it's essential for delivering timely, context-rich experiences. StreamNative's data streaming platform is built precisely for this reality, ensuring data is immediate, reliable, and ready to power critical applications.",[47,51,52,53,62,63],{},"Today, we're excited to announce that Forrester Research has named StreamNative as a Contender in its evaluation, ",[54,55,57],"a",{"href":56},"\u002Freports\u002Frecognized-in-the-forrester-wave-tm-streaming-data-platforms-q4-2025",[35,58,59],{},[43,60,61],{},"The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",". This report evaluated 15 top streaming data platform providers, and we're proud to share that ",[43,64,65],{},"StreamNative received the highest scores possible—5 out of 5—in both the Messaging and Resource Optimization criteria.",[47,67,68,69],{},"***Forrester's Take: ***",[35,70,71],{},"\"StreamNative is a good fit for enterprises that want an Apache Pulsar implementation that is also compatible with Kafka APIs.\"",[47,73,74],{},[35,75,76],{},"— The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",[47,78,79],{},"Being recognized in the Forrester Wave is a proud milestone, and for us, it highlights how far StreamNative has come in enabling enterprises to unlock the power of real-time data. In the sections below, we'll dive into what we believe sets StreamNative apart—from our modern architecture and cloud-native design to our open-source foundation and real-time use cases—and how we see these strengths aligning with Forrester's findings.",[39,81,83],{"id":82},"trusted-by-industry-leaders",[43,84,85],{},"Trusted by Industry Leaders",[47,87,88,89,92,93,96,97,100],{},"Companies across industries are already leveraging StreamNative to drive real-time outcomes. Global enterprises like ",[43,90,91],{},"Cisco"," rely on StreamNative to handle massive IoT telemetry, supporting 245 million+ connected devices. Martech leaders such as ",[43,94,95],{},"Iterable"," process billions of events per day with StreamNative for hyper-personalized customer engagement. And in financial services, ",[43,98,99],{},"FICO"," trusts StreamNative to power its real-time fraud detection and analytics pipelines with a secure, scalable streaming backbone.",[47,102,103,104,107],{},"The Forrester report notes that, “",[35,105,106],{},"Customers appreciate the lower infrastructure costs that result from StreamNative’s cost-efficient, Kafka-compatible architecture. Customers note excellent support responsiveness…","”",[39,109,111],{"id":110},"modern-cloud-native-architecture-built-for-scale",[43,112,113],{},"Modern, Cloud-Native Architecture Built for Scale",[47,115,116],{},"From day one, StreamNative was designed with a modern architecture to meet the demanding scale and flexibility requirements of real-time data. Unlike legacy streaming systems that often rely on tightly coupled storage and compute, StreamNative's platform takes a cloud-native approach: it decouples these layers to enable elastic scalability and efficient resource utilization across any environment. The core is powered by Apache Pulsar—a distributed messaging and streaming engine—enhanced with multi-protocol support (including native Apache Kafka API compatibility) to unify diverse data streams under one roof. This means organizations can consolidate siloed messaging systems and handle both high-volume event streams and traditional message queues on a single platform, without sacrificing performance or reliability.",[47,118,119,120,107],{},"Forrester's evaluation described that “",[35,121,122],{},"StreamNative aims to provide a high-performance, multi-protocol streaming data platform: It uses Apache Pulsar with Kafka API compatibility to deliver cost-efficient, real-time applications for enterprises. It appeals to organizations that want a flexible, low-cost streaming solution, due to its focus on scalability and resource optimization, while its investments in Pulsar’s open-source ecosystem and performance optimization make it the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar.",[47,124,125],{},"Our cloud-first, leaderless architecture (with no single broker bottlenecks) and tiered storage model were built to maximize throughput and cost-efficiency for real-time workloads. By separating compute from storage and leveraging distributed object storage, StreamNative can retain huge volumes of event data indefinitely while keeping compute costs in check—effectively providing a flexible, low-cost streaming solution.",[47,127,128,129,132],{},"This modern design not only delivers high performance, but also ensures fault tolerance and geo-distribution out of the box, so enterprises can trust their streaming data is always available and durable. As Forrester’s evaluation noted, StreamNative ",[35,130,131],{},"\"excels at messaging and resource optimization\" and “Its platform supports use cases like real-time analytics and event-driven architectures with robust scalability.","” Our architecture provides the strong foundation that today's real-time applications demand, from ultra-fast data ingestion to seamless scale-out across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.",[39,134,136],{"id":135},"open-source-foundation-and-pulsar-expertise",[43,137,138],{},"Open Source Foundation and Pulsar Expertise",[47,140,141],{},"StreamNative's DNA is rooted in open source innovation. Our founders are the original creators of Apache Pulsar, and we've built our platform with the same open principles: freedom, flexibility, and community-driven innovation. For developers and data teams, this means adopting StreamNative comes with no proprietary lock-in—instead, you get a platform built on open standards and a thriving ecosystem. We offer broad API compatibility (Pulsar, Kafka, JMS, MQTT, and more) so that teams can work with familiar interfaces and integrate StreamNative into existing systems with ease.",[47,143,144],{},"StreamNative is the primary commercial contributor to the Apache Pulsar project and its surrounding ecosystem. We invest heavily in Pulsar's ongoing improvements our investments in Pulsar's open-source ecosystem and performance optimization bolster StreamNative's value. We also foster a vibrant community through initiatives like the Data Streaming Summit and free training resources.",[47,146,147,148,151,152,155],{},"Forrester's assessment noted that StreamNative’s “",[35,149,150],{},"events-driven agents, extensibility, and performance architecture are solid,","” and we're continuing to build on that foundation. ",[43,153,154],{},"We're actively investing in expanding our tooling for observability, governance, schema management, and developer productivity","—areas we recognize as critical for enterprise adoption and where we're committed to accelerating our roadmap.",[47,157,158,159],{},"Being open also means embracing an open ecosystem of technologies. StreamNative actively integrates with the tools and platforms that matter most to our users. We partner with industry leaders like Snowflake, Databricks, Google, and Ververica to ensure our streaming platform works seamlessly with data warehouses, lakehouse storage, and stream processing frameworks. Forrester’s evaluation observed that StreamNative’s ",[35,160,161],{},"\"investments in Pulsar’s open-source ecosystem and performance optimization make it the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar.\"",[39,163,165],{"id":164},"powering-real-time-use-cases-across-industries",[43,166,167],{},"Powering Real-Time Use Cases Across Industries",[47,169,170],{},"One of the greatest validations of StreamNative's approach is the success our customers are achieving with real-time data. StreamNative's platform is versatile and use-case agnostic—if an application demands high-volume, low-latency data movement, we can power it. This flexibility is why our customer base spans industries from finance and IoT to major automobile manufacturers and online gaming. The common thread is that these organizations need to process and react to data in milliseconds, and StreamNative is delivering the capabilities to make that possible.",[47,172,173],{},"Cisco uses StreamNative to underpin an IoT telemetry system of colossal scale, connecting hundreds of millions of devices and thousands of enterprise clients with real-time data streams. The platform's multi-tenant design and proven reliability allow Cisco to offer its customers a live feed of device data with unwavering confidence. In the financial sector, FICO has built streaming pipelines on StreamNative to detect fraud as transactions happen and to monitor systems in real time. With StreamNative's strong guarantees around message durability and ordering, FICO can catch anomalies or suspicious patterns within seconds. And in digital customer engagement, Iterable relies on StreamNative to process billions of events every day—clicks, views, purchases—so that marketers can trigger personalized campaigns instantly based on user behavior.",[47,175,176],{},"Our customers uniformly deal with mission-critical data streams, where downtime or delays are unacceptable. StreamNative's fault-tolerant, scalable infrastructure has proven equal to the task, handling scenarios like bursting to millions of events per second or seamlessly spanning multiple cloud regions. Forrester's report recognized StreamNative for supporting event-driven architectures with robust scalability—which for us is a reflection of our platform's ability to meet the most demanding enterprise requirements.",[39,178,180],{"id":179},"continuing-to-innovate-ursa-orca-and-the-road-ahead",[43,181,182],{},"Continuing to Innovate: Ursa, Orca, and the Road Ahead",[47,184,185,186,189],{},"While we are thrilled to be recognized in Forrester's Streaming Data Platforms Wave, we view this as just the beginning. StreamNative's vision has always been bold: to ",[43,187,188],{},"provide a unified platform that not only handles today's streaming needs but also anticipates the emerging requirements of tomorrow",".",[47,191,192],{},"One key area of focus is the convergence of streaming data with advanced analytics and AI. As Forrester points out in the report, technology leaders should look for platforms that natively integrate messaging, stream processing, and analytics to provide AI agents with real-time, contextualized information. We couldn't agree more. Our award-winning Ursa Engine and Orca Agent Engine are aimed at extending our platform up the stack—bridging the gap between data streams and data lakes, and between event streams and intelligent processing.",[47,194,195],{},"Our new Ursa Engine introduces a lakehouse-native approach to streaming: it can write events directly to table formats like Iceberg on cloud storage, eliminating entire classes of ETL jobs and making fresh data instantly available for analytics queries. By integrating streaming and lakehouse technologies, we help customers collapse data silos and accelerate their AI\u002FML pipelines.",[47,197,198,199,202],{},"Beyond analytics integration, we are also enhancing StreamNative with more out-of-the-box processing and governance capabilities. In the coming months, we plan to introduce new features for lightweight stream processing and transformation, making it easier to build reactive applications directly on the platform. We're also expanding our ecosystem of connectors and integrations, so that whether your data lands in Snowflake, Databricks, or an AI model, StreamNative will seamlessly feed it. ",[43,200,201],{},"We're investing significantly in enterprise features including security, schema registry, governance, and monitoring tooling","—capabilities that are essential for mission-critical deployments and where we're committed to continued improvement.",[47,204,205],{},"This recognition from Forrester energizes us to keep innovating at full speed. We're sharing this honor with our amazing customers, community, and partners who drive us forward every day. Your feedback and real-world challenges have helped shape StreamNative into what it is today, and together, we will shape the future of streaming data. Thank you for joining us on this journey—we're just getting started, and we can't wait to deliver even more value as we continue to evolve our platform. Onward to real-time everything!",[207,208],"hr",{},[31,210,212],{"id":211},"streamnative-in-the-forrester-wave-evaluation-findings",[43,213,214,215,222],{},"StreamNative in ",[43,216,217],{},[54,218,219],{"href":56},[43,220,221],{},"The Forrester Wave™",": Evaluation Findings",[224,225,227],"h5",{"id":226},"recognized-as-a-contender-among-15-streaming-data-platform-providers","• Recognized as a Contender among 15 streaming data platform providers",[224,229,231],{"id":230},"received-the-highest-scores-possible-50-in-both-the-messaging-and-resource-optimization-criteria","* Received the highest scores possible (5.0) in both the Messaging and Resource Optimization criteria",[224,233,235],{"id":234},"cited-as-the-primary-platform-for-enterprises-wishing-to-implement-pulsar","• Cited as the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar",[224,237,239],{"id":238},"noted-for-excelling-at-messaging-and-resource-optimization","• Noted for excelling at messaging and resource optimization",[224,241,243],{"id":242},"customers-cited-lower-infrastructure-costs-and-excellent-support-responsiveness","• Customers cited lower infrastructure costs and excellent support responsiveness",[224,245,247],{"id":246},"recognized-for-supporting-event-driven-architectures-with-robust-scalability","• Recognized for supporting event-driven architectures with robust scalability",[207,249],{},[251,252,254,255,258,259,189],"h6",{"id":253},"forrester-disclaimer-forrester-does-not-endorse-any-company-product-brand-or-service-included-in-its-research-publications-and-does-not-advise-any-person-to-select-the-products-or-services-of-any-company-or-brand-based-on-the-ratings-included-in-such-publications-information-is-based-on-the-best-available-resources-opinions-reflect-judgment-at-the-time-and-are-subject-to-change-for-more-information-read-about-forresters-objectivity-here","**Forrester Disclaimer: **",[35,256,257],{},"Forrester does not endorse any company, product, brand, or service included in its research publications and does not advise any person to select the products or services of any company or brand based on the ratings included in such publications. Information is based on the best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change",". *For more information, read about Forrester’s objectivity *",[54,260,264],{"href":261,"rel":262},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.forrester.com\u002Fabout-us\u002Fobjectivity\u002F",[263],"nofollow",[35,265,266],{},"here",[207,268],{},[251,270,272],{"id":271},"apache-apache-pulsar-apache-kafka-apache-flink-and-other-names-are-trademarks-of-the-apache-software-foundation-no-endorsement-by-apache-or-other-third-parties-is-implied",[35,273,274],{},"Apache®, Apache Pulsar®, Apache Kafka®, Apache Flink® and other names are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation. No endorsement by Apache or other third parties is implied.",{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":276},[277,279,280,281,282,283,284],{"id":33,"depth":278,"text":37},3,{"id":41,"depth":18,"text":45},{"id":82,"depth":18,"text":85},{"id":110,"depth":18,"text":113},{"id":135,"depth":18,"text":138},{"id":164,"depth":18,"text":167},{"id":179,"depth":18,"text":182,"children":285},[286],{"id":211,"depth":278,"text":287},"StreamNative in The Forrester Wave™: Evaluation Findings","Company","2025-12-16","StreamNative is recognized in The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025. Discover why Forrester highlights StreamNative's high-performance messaging, efficient resource use, and cost-effective Kafka API compatibility for real-time innovation.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F693bd36cf01b217dcb67278f_Streamnative_blog_thumbnail.png",false,{},0,"\u002Fblog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025","10 mins read",{"title":25,"description":290},"blog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025",[300,301,302],"Announcements","Real-Time","Forrester","sOeeJtEO3O-IIfTPJjY1AFOMawZ_rf8FOH8A98NEKgU",{"id":305,"title":306,"authors":307,"body":312,"category":1071,"createdAt":10,"date":1072,"description":1073,"extension":8,"featured":7,"image":1074,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":1075,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":1076,"readingTime":1077,"relatedResources":10,"seo":1078,"stem":1079,"tags":1080,"__hash__":1083},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour.md","How We Run a 5 GB\u002Fs Kafka Workload for Just $50 per Hour",[308,309,310,311],"Matteo Meril","Neng Lu","Hang Chen","Penghui Li",{"type":14,"value":313,"toc":1041},[314,317,320,323,326,329,333,336,346,352,355,363,368,372,379,382,385,393,397,400,405,409,412,415,418,421,430,434,437,448,451,455,458,461,472,475,479,483,491,494,498,506,535,539,542,547,551,554,558,561,564,569,578,583,586,589,600,604,607,618,622,625,628,633,636,665,669,671,677,680,685,690,693,697,711,715,726,730,745,754,765,768,771,775,778,781,792,795,798,801,806,811,815,819,836,840,854,859,863,874,877,893,897,908,913,918,926,930,933,937,944,948,951,960,965,974,980,989,998,1007,1016,1025,1033],[47,315,316],{},"The rise of DeepSeek has shaken the AI infrastructure market, forcing companies to confront the escalating costs of training and deploying AI models. But the real pressure point isn’t just compute—it’s data acquisition and ingestion costs.",[47,318,319],{},"As businesses rethink their AI cost-containment strategies, real-time data streaming is emerging as a critical enabler. The growing adoption of Kafka as a standard protocol has expanded cost-efficient options, allowing companies to optimize streaming analytics while keeping expenses in check.",[47,321,322],{},"Ursa, the data streaming engine powering StreamNative’s managed Kafka service, is built for this new reality. With its leaderless architecture and native lakehouse storage integration, Ursa eliminates costly inter-zone network traffic for data replication and client-to-broker communication while ensuring high availability at minimal operational cost.",[47,324,325],{},"In this blog post, we benchmarked the infrastructure cost and total cost of ownership (TCO) for running a 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workload across different Kafka vendors, including Redpanda, Confluent WarpStream, and AWS MSK. Our benchmark results show that Ursa can sustain 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workloads at just 5% of the cost of traditional streaming engines like Redpanda—making it the ideal solution for high-performance, cost-efficient ingestion and data streaming for data lakehouses and AI workloads.",[47,327,328],{},"Note: We also evaluated vanilla Kafka in our benchmark; however, for simplicity, we have focused our cost comparison on vendor solutions rather than self-managed deployments. That said, it is important to highlight that both Redpanda and vanilla Kafka use a leader-based data replication approach. In a data-intensive, network-bound workload like 5GB\u002Fs streaming, with the same machine type and replication factor, Redpanda and vanilla Kafka produced nearly identical cost profiles.",[39,330,332],{"id":331},"key-benchmark-findings","Key Benchmark Findings",[47,334,335],{},"Ursa delivered 5 GB\u002Fs of sustained throughput at an infrastructure cost of just $54 per hour. For comparison:",[337,338,339,343],"ul",{},[340,341,342],"li",{},"MSK: $303 per hour → 5.6x more expensive compared to Ursa",[340,344,345],{},"Redpanda: $988 per hour → 18x more expensive compared to Ursa",[47,347,348],{},[349,350],"img",{"alt":17,"src":351},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c71b67d9046f26edc7977_AD_4nXfvTqyBNUBu2lObdkKAx-5UNkpNP8UYULLZyOcixE6z99VMZUUEsUqWjzexI7vjyNGRNSAUoM9smYvdTP55ctAhIbrs5lmQgcSVMWdaoigbWouCl95DVSQsxooY-qqfGcYqS4g4zA.png",[47,353,354],{},"Beyond infrastructure costs, when factoring in both storage pricing, vendor pricing and operational expenses, Ursa’s total cost of ownership (TCO) for a 5GB\u002Fs workload with a 7-day retention period is:",[337,356,357,360],{},[340,358,359],{},"50% cheaper than Confluent WarpStream",[340,361,362],{},"85% cheaper than MSK and Redpanda",[47,364,365],{},[349,366],{"alt":17,"src":367},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d77e9c706de5343b8_AD_4nXeDv8rrv_C1CTCCiqYo1zpvlGYbdBk1r0VEqovAPu22iFMQZgh54Hfw9PBMLzM7jDFxKwAFDxbdG0np4XVk_tGsWhEKMloLRcmmea7lvueCx-0cFsyaE3Mya4Mxc1Dox95A6JEc.png",[39,369,371],{"id":370},"ursa-highly-cost-efficient-data-streaming-at-scale","Ursa: Highly Cost-Efficient Data Streaming at Scale",[47,373,374,378],{},[54,375,377],{"href":376},"\u002Fblog\u002Fursa-reimagine-apache-kafka-for-the-cost-conscious-data-streaming","Ursa"," is a next-generation data streaming engine designed to deliver high performance at a fraction of the cost of traditional disk-based solutions. It is fully compatible with Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar APIs, while leveraging a leaderless, lakehouse-native architecture to maximize scalability, efficiency, and cost savings.",[47,380,381],{},"Ursa’s key innovation is separating storage from compute and decoupling metadata\u002Findex operations from data operations by utilizing cloud object storage (e.g., AWS S3) instead of costly inter-zone disk-based replication. It also employs open lakehouse formats (Iceberg and Delta Lake), enabling columnar compression to significantly reduce storage costs while maintaining durability and availability.",[47,383,384],{},"In contrast, traditional streaming systems—like Kafka and Redpanda—depend on leader-based architectures, which drive up inter-zone traffic costs due to replication and client communication. Ursa mitigates these costs by:",[337,386,387,390],{},[340,388,389],{},"Eliminating inter-zone traffic costs via a leaderless architecture.",[340,391,392],{},"Replacing costly inter-zone replication with direct writes to cloud storage using open lakehouse formats.",[39,394,396],{"id":395},"how-ursa-eliminates-inter-zone-traffic","How Ursa Eliminates Inter-Zone Traffic",[47,398,399],{},"Ursa minimizes inter-zone traffic by leveraging a leaderless architecture, which eliminates inter-zone communication between clients and brokers, and lakehouse-native storage, which removes the need for inter-zone data replication. This approach ensures high availability and scalability while avoiding unnecessary cross-zone data movement.",[47,401,402],{},[349,403],{"alt":17,"src":404},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602e21b3571bb7117dca_AD_4nXd7Oahc77NjRLNvA9clLt0tsyU6MrIqVibFYv5pW5giTIcCHPr3EA_yTGzfVEUIVO3VXK56qWK8zmBCp5lY0E_4nmlWIPFrHjtHylA5NhwELjn-UB0fLG2h_kbrxrc7Cs_edvveNA.png",[31,406,408],{"id":407},"leaderless-architecture","Leaderless architecture",[47,410,411],{},"Traditional streaming engines such as Kafka, Pulsar, or RedPanda rely on a leader-based model, where each partition is assigned to a single leader broker that handles all writes and reads.",[47,413,414],{},"Pros of Leader-Based Architectures:\n✔ Maintains message ordering via local sequence IDs\n✔ Delivers low latency and high performance through message caching",[47,416,417],{},"Cons of Leader-Based Architectures:\n✖ Throughput bottlenecked by a single broker per partition\n✖ Inter-zone traffic required for high availability in multi-AZ deployments",[47,419,420],{},"While Kafka and Pulsar offer partial solutions (e.g., reading from followers, shadow topics) to reduce read-related inter-zone traffic, producers still send data to a single leader.",[47,422,423,424,429],{},"Ursa removes the concept of topic ownership, allowing any broker in the cluster to handle reads or writes for any partition. The primary challenge—ensuring message ordering—is solved with ",[54,425,428],{"href":426,"rel":427},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fstreamnative\u002Foxia",[263],"Oxia",", a scalable metadata and index service created by StreamNative in 2022.",[31,431,433],{"id":432},"oxia-the-metadata-layer-enabling-leaderless-architecture","Oxia: The Metadata Layer Enabling Leaderless Architecture",[47,435,436],{},"Ensuring message ordering in a leaderless architecture is complex, but Ursa solves this with Oxia:",[337,438,439,442,445],{},[340,440,441],{},"Handles millions of metadata\u002Findex operations per second",[340,443,444],{},"Generates sequential IDs to maintain strict message ordering",[340,446,447],{},"Optimized for Kubernetes with horizontal scalability",[47,449,450],{},"Producers and consumers can connect to any broker within their local AZ, eliminating inter-zone traffic costs while maintaining performance through localized caching.",[31,452,454],{"id":453},"zero-interzone-data-replication","Zero interzone data replication",[47,456,457],{},"In most distributed systems, data replication from a leader (primary) to followers (replicas) is crucial for fault tolerance and availability. However, replication across zones can inflate infrastructure expenses substantially.",[47,459,460],{},"Ursa avoids these costs by writing data directly to cloud storage (e.g., AWS S3, Google GCS):",[337,462,463,466,469],{},[340,464,465],{},"Built-In Resilience: Cloud storage inherently offers high availability and fault tolerance without inter-zone traffic fees.",[340,467,468],{},"Tradeoff: Slightly higher latency (sub-second, with p99 at 500 milliseconds) compared to local disk\u002FEBS (single-digit to sub-100 milliseconds), in exchange for significantly lower costs (up to 10x lower).",[340,470,471],{},"Flexible Modes: Ursa is an addition to the classic BookKeeper-based engine, providing users with the flexibility to optimize for either cost or low latency based on their workload requirements.",[47,473,474],{},"By foregoing conventional replication, Ursa slashes inter-zone traffic costs and associated complexities—making it a compelling option for organizations seeking to balance high-performance data streaming with strict budget constraints.",[39,476,478],{"id":477},"how-we-ran-a-5-gbs-test-with-ursa","How We Ran a 5 GB\u002Fs Test with Ursa",[31,480,482],{"id":481},"ursa-cluster-deployment","Ursa Cluster Deployment",[337,484,485,488],{},[340,486,487],{},"9 brokers across 3 availability zones, each on m6i.8xlarge (Fixed 12.5 Gbps bandwidth, 32 vCPU cores, 128 GB memory).",[340,489,490],{},"Oxia cluster (metadata store) with 3 nodes of m6i.8xlarge, distributed across three availability zones (AZs).",[47,492,493],{},"During peak throughput (5 GB\u002Fs), each broker’s network usage was about 10 Gbps.",[31,495,497],{"id":496},"openmessaging-benchmark-workers-configuration","OpenMessaging Benchmark Workers & Configuration",[47,499,500,501,505],{},"The OpenMessaging Benchmark(OMB) Framework is a suite of tools that make it easy to benchmark distributed messaging systems in the cloud. Please check ",[54,502,503],{"href":503,"rel":504},"https:\u002F\u002Fopenmessaging.cloud\u002Fdocs\u002Fbenchmarks\u002F",[263]," for details.",[337,507,508,523,532],{},[340,509,510,511,516,517,522],{},"12 OMB workers: 6 for ",[54,512,515],{"href":513,"rel":514},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002Fd1094122270775e4f1580947f80c5055",[263],"producers",", 6 for ",[54,518,521],{"href":519,"rel":520},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002F06bada89381fb77a7862e1b4c1d8963d",[263],"consumers"," across 3 availability zones, on m6i.8xlarge instances. Each worker is configured with 12 CPU cores and 48 GB memory.",[340,524,525,526,531],{},"Sample YAML ",[54,527,530],{"href":528,"rel":529},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002F204c1f26c4d44a218ae235bf2de99904",[263],"scripts"," provided for Kafka-compatible configuration and rate limits.",[340,533,534],{},"Achieved consistent 5 GB\u002Fs publish\u002Fsubscribe throughput.",[39,536,538],{"id":537},"ursa-benchmark-tests-results","Ursa Benchmark Tests & Results",[47,540,541],{},"The following diagram demonstrates that Ursa can consistently handle 5 GB\u002Fs of traffic, fully saturating the network across all broker nodes.",[47,543,544],{},[349,545],{"alt":17,"src":546},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d7b261bac1113f7d6_AD_4nXdDPsRc3koXICiFF0bqSmGWbJt_RlUy4FE3ruuWOfbCfpcqZ1dejjqGbkaCJv2hQFL1nirRouBVRW2l5uMWBvY9naMqGB_wHcLI14dBM0f85TXhmdm3UxEv1yGX9Y4hf5FttSkZew.png",[39,548,550],{"id":549},"comparing-infrastructure-cost","Comparing Infrastructure Cost",[47,552,553],{},"This benchmark first evaluates infrastructure costs of running a 5 GB\u002Fs streaming workload (1:1 producer-to-consumer ratio) across different data streaming engines, including Ursa, Redpanda, and AWS MSK, with a focus on multi-AZ deployments to ensure a fair comparison.",[31,555,557],{"id":556},"test-setup-key-assumptions","Test Setup & Key Assumptions",[47,559,560],{},"All tests use multi-AZ configurations, with clusters and clients distributed across three AWS availability zones (AZs). Cluster size scales proportionally to the number of AZs, and rack-awareness is enabled for all engines to evenly distribute topic partitions and leaders.",[47,562,563],{},"To ensure a fair comparison, we selected the same machine type capable of fully utilizing both network and storage bandwidth for Ursa and Redpanda in this 5GB\u002Fs test:",[337,565,566],{},[340,567,568],{},"9 × m6i.8xlarge instances",[47,570,571,572,577],{},"However, MSK's storage bandwidth limits vary depending on the selected instance type, with the highest allowed limit capped at 1000 MiB\u002Fs per broker, according to",[54,573,576],{"href":574,"rel":575},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.aws.amazon.com\u002Fmsk\u002Flatest\u002Fdeveloperguide\u002Fmsk-provision-throughput-management.html#throughput-bottlenecks",[263]," AWS documentation",". Given this constraint, achieving 5 GB\u002Fs throughput with a replication factor of 3 required the following setup:",[337,579,580],{},[340,581,582],{},"15 × kafka.m7g.8xlarge (32 vCPUs, 128 GB memory, 15 Gbps network, 4000 GiB EBS).",[47,584,585],{},"This configuration was necessary to work around MSK's storage bandwidth limitations, ensuring a comparable cost basis to other evaluated streaming engines.",[47,587,588],{},"Additional key assumptions include:",[337,590,591,594,597],{},[340,592,593],{},"Inter-AZ producer traffic: For leader-based engines, two-thirds of producer-to-broker traffic crosses AZs due to leader distribution.",[340,595,596],{},"Consumer optimizations: Follower fetch is enabled across all tests, eliminating inter-AZ consumer traffic.",[340,598,599],{},"Storage cost exclusions: This benchmark only evaluates streaming costs, assuming no long-term data retention.",[31,601,603],{"id":602},"inter-broker-replication-costs","Inter-Broker Replication Costs",[47,605,606],{},"Inter-broker (cross-AZ) replication is a major cost driver for data streaming engines:",[337,608,609,612,615],{},[340,610,611],{},"RedPanda: Inter-broker replication is not free, leading to substantial costs when data must be copied across multiple availability zones.",[340,613,614],{},"AWS MSK: Inter-broker replication is free, but MSK instance pricing is significantly higher (e.g., $3.264 per hour for kafka.m7g.8xlarge vs $1.306 per hour for an on-demand m7g.8xlarge). The storage price of MSK is $0.10 per GB-month which is significantly higher than st1, which costs $0.045 per GB-month. Even though replication is free, client-to-broker traffic still incurs inter-AZ charges.",[340,616,617],{},"Ursa: No inter-broker replication costs due to its leaderless architecture, eliminating inter-zone replication costs entirely.",[31,619,621],{"id":620},"zone-affinity-reducing-inter-az-costs","Zone Affinity: Reducing Inter-AZ Costs",[47,623,624],{},"We evaluated zone affinity mechanisms to further reduce inter-AZ data transfer costs.",[47,626,627],{},"Consumers:",[337,629,630],{},[340,631,632],{},"Follower fetch is enabled across all tests, ensuring consumers fetch data from replicas in their local AZ—eliminating inter-zone consumer traffic except for metadata lookups",[47,634,635],{},"Producers:",[337,637,638,647,656],{},[340,639,640,641,646],{},"Kafka protocol lacks an easy way to enforce producer AZ affinity (though ",[54,642,645],{"href":643,"rel":644},"https:\u002F\u002Fcwiki.apache.org\u002Fconfluence\u002Fdisplay\u002FKAFKA\u002FKIP-1123:+Rack-aware+partitioning+for+Kafka+Producer",[263],"KIP-1123"," aims to address this). And it only works with the default partitioner (i.e., when no record partition or record key is specified).",[340,648,649,650,655],{},"Redpanda recently introduced ",[54,651,654],{"href":652,"rel":653},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.redpanda.com\u002Fredpanda-cloud\u002Fdevelop\u002Fproduce-data\u002Fleader-pinning\u002F",[263],"leader pinning",", but this only benefits setups where producers are confined to a single AZ—not applicable to our multi-AZ benchmark.",[340,657,658,659,664],{},"Ursa is the only system in this test with ",[54,660,663],{"href":661,"rel":662},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.streamnative.io\u002Fdocs\u002Fconfig-kafka-client#eliminate-cross-az-networking-traffic",[263],"built-in zone affinity for both producers and consumers",". It achieves this by embedding producer AZ information in client.id, allowing metadata lookups to route clients to local-AZ brokers, eliminating inter-AZ producer traffic.",[31,666,668],{"id":667},"cost-comparison-results","Cost Comparison Results",[47,670,335],{},[337,672,673,675],{},[340,674,342],{},[340,676,345],{},[47,678,679],{},"Ursa’s leaderless architecture, zone affinity, and native cloud storage integration deliver unparalleled cost efficiency, making it the most cost-effective choice for high-throughput data streaming workloads.",[47,681,682],{},[349,683],{"alt":17,"src":684},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c72208198ca36a352f228_AD_4nXeeZuM8T-xBlD4Vf3j67K618n08qh8wIDLLtiLJG0ssA1Wj1V26u7wIDTX9sqLrtw8mB2c299dwzarGen62CG0Vh7nWstn5qbPGFcBaKJYEepTsLr5fHWv1U8uqbg8Y0UOK6fJ7.png",[47,686,687],{},[349,688],{"alt":17,"src":689},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c625978031f40229de484_AD_4nXdLkLLJ30KKr-_A_rN1j8akVwBYacAWIPzWHoOReJF421890kfByZoQQxkLczihVSmiw5Q9J51-V9I2SEKITbwsYnANDDTlAVL5nQ_jfaHNTe9VEWhSoa7DZooCnilDYL6l6msmJg.png",[47,691,692],{},"The detailed infrastructure cost calculations for each data streaming engine are listed below:",[31,694,696],{"id":695},"streamnative-ursa","StreamNative - Ursa",[337,698,699,702,705,708],{},[340,700,701],{},"Server EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr = $14",[340,703,704],{},"Client EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr =$14",[340,706,707],{},"S3 write requests costs: 1350 r\u002Fs * $0.005\u002F1000r * 3600s = $24",[340,709,710],{},"S3 read requests costs: 1350 r\u002Fs * $0.0004\u002F1000r * 3600s = $2",[31,712,714],{"id":713},"aws-msk","AWS MSK",[337,716,717,720,723],{},[340,718,719],{},"Server EC2 costs: 15 * $3.264\u002Fhr = $49",[340,721,722],{},"Client side EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr =$14",[340,724,725],{},"Interzone traffic - producer to broker: 5GB\u002Fs * ⅔ * $0.02\u002FG(in+out) * 3600 = $240",[31,727,729],{"id":728},"redpanda","RedPanda",[337,731,732,734,736,739,742],{},[340,733,701],{},[340,735,704],{},[340,737,738],{},"Interzone traffic - producer to broker: 5GB\u002Fs * ⅔ * $0.02\u002FGB(in+out) * 3600 = $240",[340,740,741],{},"Interzone traffic - replication: 10GB\u002Fs * $0.02\u002FGB(in+out) * 3600 = $720",[340,743,744],{},"Interzone traffic - broker to consumer: $0 (fetch from local zone)",[47,746,747,748,753],{},"Please note that we were unable to test ",[54,749,752],{"href":750,"rel":751},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.redpanda.com\u002Fblog\u002Fcloud-topics-streaming-data-object-storage",[263],"Redpanda with Cloud Topics",", as it remains an announced but unreleased feature and is not yet available for evaluation. Based on the limited information available, while Cloud Topics may help optimize inter-zone data replication costs, producers still need to traverse inter-availability zones to connect to the topic partition owners and incur inter-zone traffic costs of up to $240 per hour.",[337,755,756,762],{},[340,757,758,761],{},[54,759,645],{"href":643,"rel":760},[263]," (when implemented) will help mitigate producer-to-broker inter-zone traffic, but it is not yet available. And it only works with the default partitioner (no record partition or key is specified).",[340,763,764],{},"Redpanda’s leader pinning helps only when all producers for the pinned topic are confined to a single AZ. In multi-AZ environments (like our benchmark), inter-zone producer traffic remains unavoidable.",[47,766,767],{},"Additionally, Redpanda’s Cloud Topics architecture is not documented publicly. Their blog mentions \"leader placement rules to optimize produce latency and ingress cost,\" but it is unclear whether this represents a shift away from a leader-based architecture or if it uses techniques similar to Ursa’s zone-aware approach.",[47,769,770],{},"We may revisit this comparison as more details become available.",[39,772,774],{"id":773},"comparing-total-cost-of-ownership","Comparing Total Cost of Ownership",[47,776,777],{},"As highlighted earlier, with a BYOC Ursa setup, you can achieve 5 GB\u002Fs throughput at just 5% of the infrastructure cost of a traditional leader-based data streaming engine, such as Kafka or RedPanda, while managing the infrastructure yourself. This significant cost reduction is enabled by Ursa’s leaderless architecture and lakehouse-native storage design, which eliminate overhead costs such as inter-zone traffic and leader-based data replication. By leveraging a lakehouse-native, leaderless architecture, Ursa reduces resource requirements, enabling you to handle high data throughput efficiently and at a fraction of the cost of RedPanda.",[47,779,780],{},"Now, let’s examine the total cost comparison, evaluating Ursa alongside other vendors, including those that have adopted a leaderless architecture (e.g., Confluent WarpStream). This comparison is based on a 5GB\u002Fs workload with a 7-day retention period, factoring in both storage cost and vendor costs Here are the key findings:",[337,782,783,786,789],{},[340,784,785],{},"Ursa ($164,353\u002Fmonth) is: 50% cheaper than Confluent WarpStream ($337,068\u002Fmonth)",[340,787,788],{},"85% cheaper than AWS MSK ($1,115,251\u002Fmonth)",[340,790,791],{},"86% cheaper than Redpanda ($1,202,853\u002Fmonth)",[47,793,794],{},"In addition to Ursa’s architectural advantages—eliminating most inter-AZ traffic and leveraging lakehouse storage for cost-effective data retention—it also adopts a more fair and cost-efficient pricing model: Elastic Throughput-based pricing. This approach aligns costs with actual usage, avoiding unnecessary overhead.",[47,796,797],{},"Unlike WarpStream, which charges for both storage and throughput, Ursa ensures that customers only pay for the throughput they actively use. Ursa’s pricing is based on compressed data sent by clients, meaning the more data compressed on the client side, the lower the cost. In contrast, WarpStream prices are based on uncompressed data, unfairly inflating expenses and failing to incentivize customers to optimize their client applications.",[47,799,800],{},"This distinction is crucial, as compressed data reduces both storage and network costs, making Ursa’s pricing model not only more cost-effective but also more transparent and predictable.",[47,802,803],{},[349,804],{"alt":17,"src":805},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d194800c9206d9d58_AD_4nXcFlf755xgyz7htxhMhBV5fGrsxy642mQNodt61DTok_z1dwkw5A6lkO5hatXVneCaB0anbZPAyvLI3MlIMuQEYLEACHHvQMOr5UfaB37dfzkdqewDEvcT-20VGd_zzvJsuA00zGA.png",[47,807,808],{},[349,809],{"alt":17,"src":810},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c62594e9c2e629fae73aa_AD_4nXeU6cOgItnjLsEZCOf13TEvMY_SHWWIxYP2OYUj-B1GUPyWO78OG08K_v03hwYSVcg06f9dqDiGmdwy76vynjmiDGL5bluZ5_XF4nSU_r59oOZdfViXndXt6s11vVOY7qwfZN8v.png",[31,812,814],{"id":813},"cost-breakdown","Cost Breakdown",[816,817,818],"h4",{"id":695},"StreamNative – Ursa",[337,820,821,824,827,830,833],{},[340,822,823],{},"EC2 (Server): 9 × $1.536\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $9,953.28",[340,825,826],{},"S3 Write Requests: 1,350 r\u002Fs × $0.005\u002F1,000 r × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $17,496",[340,828,829],{},"S3 Read Requests: 1,350 r\u002Fs × $0.0004\u002F1,000 r × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $1,400",[340,831,832],{},"S3 Storage Costs: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.021\u002FGB × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days = $63,504",[340,834,835],{},"Vendor Cost: 200 ETU × $0.50\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $72,000",[816,837,839],{"id":838},"warpstream","WarpStream",[337,841,842,845],{},[340,843,844],{},"Based on WarpStream’s pricing calculator (as of January 29, 2025), we assume a 4:1 client data compression ratio, meaning 20 GB\u002Fs of uncompressed data translates to 5 GB\u002Fs of compressed data.",[340,846,847,848,853],{},"It's important to note that WarpStream’s pricing structure has fluctuated frequently throughout January. We observed the cost reported by their calculator changing from $409,644 per month to $337,068 per month. This variability has been previously highlighted in the blog post “",[54,849,852],{"href":850,"rel":851},"https:\u002F\u002Fbigdata.2minutestreaming.com\u002Fp\u002Fthe-brutal-truth-about-apache-kafka-cost-calculators",[263],"The Brutal Truth About Kafka Cost Calculators","”. To ensure transparency, we have documented the pricing as of January 29, 2025.",[47,855,856],{},[349,857],{"alt":17,"src":858},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602e42713e0028e9af5e_AD_4nXcu5_VWTLu9jRYs6zX1MBAOtLQEo5gyfNSWPcbpnQHXTa8qNCFAXezRR2E8daygzYTTwd4dhJjaLaLM8C6y_3OGbu2NS7pdvEv3a8-ptNKOg7AeKnYqPQCAYvQ5EuxzuI3JYIvY.png",[816,860,862],{"id":861},"msk","MSK",[337,864,865,868,871],{},[340,866,867],{},"EC2 (Server): 15 * $3.264\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $35,251",[340,869,870],{},"Interzone Traffic (Client-Server): 5 GB\u002Fs × ⅔ × $0.02\u002FGB (in+out) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $172,800",[340,872,873],{},"Storage: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.1\u002FGB-month × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days * 3 replicas = $907,200",[816,875,729],{"id":876},"redpanda-1",[337,878,879,882,884,887,890],{},[340,880,881],{},"EC2 (Server): 9 × $1.536\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $9953",[340,883,870],{},[340,885,886],{},"Interzone Traffic (Replication): 5 GB\u002Fs × 2 × $0.02\u002FGB (in+out) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $518,400",[340,888,889],{},"Storage: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.045\u002FGB-month(st1) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days * 3 replicas = $408,240",[340,891,892],{},"Vendor Cost: $93,333 per month (based on limited information. See additional notes below).",[816,894,896],{"id":895},"additional-notes","Additional Notes",[337,898,899],{},[340,900,901,902,907],{},"Redpanda does not publicly disclose its BYOC pricing, making it difficult to accurately assess its total costs. We refer to information from the whitepaper “",[54,903,906],{"href":904,"rel":905},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.redpanda.com\u002Fresources\u002Fredpanda-vs-confluent-performance-tco-benchmark-report#form",[263],"Redpanda vs. Confluent: A Performance and TCO Benchmark Report by McKnight Consulting Group.","” for estimation purposes. Based on the Tier-8 pricing model in the whitepaper,  the estimated cost to support a 5GB\u002Fs workload would be $1.12 million per year ($93,333 per month). However, since this calculation is based on an estimation, we will revisit and refine the cost assessment once Redpanda publishes its BYOC pricing.",[47,909,910],{},[349,911],{"alt":17,"src":912},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602dc8a9859eed89a0ef_AD_4nXdbcO8vsNNPy4GtkNLlmNKf22fjxRvzLzH7CtOna1L08sTbvnZx3HhufeFqc1w4K2gEF7lxO2IR5supotxebAiGnA07Qa8Yr3Rd1pVK2LYKK4WurlJGwgdwwucZIFoF-N_2oBjY.png",[47,914,915],{},[349,916],{"alt":17,"src":917},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d6bc1c2287e012540_AD_4nXfcHZnLfjbjIr3ZAgoQXT9dwP3aQCOQPmGZZJUtpNZSwE6qY6M3yehIaBxCwxEIeu5PVdUPY0zhyjnow26YfgjdYgSG4GnV9ibxu0YWTIpwng6z_F6FUGJMpERMKtpsFESzXSN_Sw.png",[337,919,920,923],{},[340,921,922],{},"When estimating the storage costs for Kafka and Redpanda, we assume the use of HDD storage at $0.045\u002FGB, based on the premise that both systems can fully utilize disk bandwidth without incurring the higher costs associated with GP2 or GP3 volumes. However, in practice, many users opt for GP2 or GP3, significantly increasing the total storage cost for Kafka and Redpanda.",[340,924,925],{},"Unlike disk-based solutions, S3 storage does not require capacity preallocation—Ursa only incurs costs for the actual data stored. This contrasts with Kafka and Redpanda, where preallocating storage can drive up expenses. As a result, the real-world storage costs for Kafka and Redpanda are often 50% higher than the estimates above.",[39,927,929],{"id":928},"conclusion","Conclusion",[47,931,932],{},"Ursa represents a transformative shift in streaming data infrastructure, offering cost efficiency, scalability, and flexibility without compromising durability or reliability. By leveraging a leaderless architecture and eliminating inter-zone data replication, Ursa reduces total cost of ownership by over 90% compared to traditional leader-based streaming engines like Kafka and Redpanda. Its direct integration with cloud storage and scalable metadata & index management via Oxia ensure high availability and simplified infrastructure management.",[31,934,936],{"id":935},"balancing-latency-and-cost","Balancing Latency and Cost",[47,938,939,943],{},[54,940,942],{"href":941},"\u002Fblog\u002Fcap-theorem-for-data-streaming","Ursa trades off slightly higher latency for ultra low cost",", making it an ideal choice for the majority of streaming workloads, especially those that prioritize throughput and cost savings over ultra-low latency. Meanwhile, StreamNative’s BookKeeper-based engine remains the preferred solution for real-time, latency-sensitive applications. By combining these two approaches, StreamNative empowers customers with the flexibility to choose the right engine for their specific needs—whether it's maximizing cost savings or achieving ultra low-latency real-time performance.",[31,945,947],{"id":946},"the-future-of-streaming-infrastructure","The Future of Streaming Infrastructure",[47,949,950],{},"In an era where data fuels AI, analytics, and real-time decision-making, managing infrastructure costs is critical to sustaining innovation. Ursa is not just a cost-cutting alternative—it is a forward-thinking, lakehouse-native platform that redefines how modern data streaming infrastructure should be built and operated.",[47,952,953,954,959],{},"Whether your priority is reducing costs, improving flexibility, or ingesting massive data into lakehouses, Ursa delivers a future-proof solution for the evolving demands of real-time data streaming. ",[54,955,958],{"href":956,"rel":957},"https:\u002F\u002Fconsole.streamnative.cloud\u002F",[263],"Get started"," with StreamNative Ursa today!",[961,962,964],"h1",{"id":963},"references","References",[47,966,967,970,971],{},[968,969,428],"span",{}," ",[54,972,973],{"href":973},"\u002Fblog\u002Fintroducing-oxia-scalable-metadata-and-coordination",[47,975,976,970,978],{},[968,977,377],{},[54,979,376],{"href":376},[47,981,982,970,985],{},[968,983,984],{},"StreamNative pricing",[54,986,987],{"href":987,"rel":988},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.streamnative.io\u002Fdocs\u002Fbilling-overview",[263],[47,990,991,970,994],{},[968,992,993],{},"WarpStream pricing",[54,995,996],{"href":996,"rel":997},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.warpstream.com\u002Fpricing#pricingfaqs",[263],[47,999,1000,970,1003],{},[968,1001,1002],{},"AWS S3 pricing",[54,1004,1005],{"href":1005,"rel":1006},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Fs3\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1008,1009,970,1012],{},[968,1010,1011],{},"AWS EBS pricing",[54,1013,1014],{"href":1014,"rel":1015},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Febs\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1017,1018,970,1021],{},[968,1019,1020],{},"AWS MSK pricing",[54,1022,1023],{"href":1023,"rel":1024},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Fmsk\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1026,1027,970,1030],{},[968,1028,1029],{},"The Brutal Truth about Kafka Cost Calculators",[54,1031,850],{"href":850,"rel":1032},[263],[47,1034,1035,970,1038],{},[968,1036,1037],{},"Redpanda vs. Confluent: A Performance and TCO Benchmark Report by McKnight Consulting Group",[54,1039,904],{"href":904,"rel":1040},[263],{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1042},[1043,1044,1045,1050,1054,1055,1064,1067],{"id":331,"depth":18,"text":332},{"id":370,"depth":18,"text":371},{"id":395,"depth":18,"text":396,"children":1046},[1047,1048,1049],{"id":407,"depth":278,"text":408},{"id":432,"depth":278,"text":433},{"id":453,"depth":278,"text":454},{"id":477,"depth":18,"text":478,"children":1051},[1052,1053],{"id":481,"depth":278,"text":482},{"id":496,"depth":278,"text":497},{"id":537,"depth":18,"text":538},{"id":549,"depth":18,"text":550,"children":1056},[1057,1058,1059,1060,1061,1062,1063],{"id":556,"depth":278,"text":557},{"id":602,"depth":278,"text":603},{"id":620,"depth":278,"text":621},{"id":667,"depth":278,"text":668},{"id":695,"depth":278,"text":696},{"id":713,"depth":278,"text":714},{"id":728,"depth":278,"text":729},{"id":773,"depth":18,"text":774,"children":1065},[1066],{"id":813,"depth":278,"text":814},{"id":928,"depth":18,"text":929,"children":1068},[1069,1070],{"id":935,"depth":278,"text":936},{"id":946,"depth":278,"text":947},"StreamNative Cloud","2025-01-31","Discover how Ursa achieves 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workloads at just 5% of the cost of traditional streaming engines like Redpanda and AWS MSK. See our benchmark results comparing infrastructure costs, total cost of ownership (TCO), and performance across leading Kafka vendors.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c6593d25099b1cdcec4ca_image-31.png",{},"\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour","30 min",{"title":306,"description":1073},"blog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour",[1081,1082,301],"TCO","Apache Kafka","A0o_2xdJiLI6rf6xj4RKsxJNo_A6QN2fYzCp6gaLrFw",{"id":1085,"title":1086,"authors":1087,"body":1088,"category":1331,"createdAt":10,"date":1332,"description":1333,"extension":8,"featured":292,"image":1334,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":1335,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":1336,"readingTime":1337,"relatedResources":10,"seo":1338,"stem":1339,"tags":1340,"__hash__":1343},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar.md","At-Least-Once, Exactly-Once, and Acks in Pulsar (Pulsar Guide for RabbitMQ\u002FJMS Engineers 3\u002F10)",[311,310,309],{"type":14,"value":1089,"toc":1320},[1090,1094,1097,1101,1104,1118,1121,1124,1127,1131,1134,1137,1140,1144,1147,1151,1154,1157,1166,1169,1172,1176,1179,1182,1185,1189,1192,1195,1198,1203,1206,1209,1213,1216,1242,1246,1249,1252,1256,1279,1282,1285,1288,1290,1292,1301,1304,1311,1318],[816,1091,1093],{"id":1092},"tldr","‍TL;DR:",[47,1095,1096],{},"Pulsar ensures at-least-once delivery by persisting messages until consumers acknowledge them. In practice, this is similar to RabbitMQ’s and JMS’s default behavior – you won’t lose messages, but you could see duplicates if something fails and a message is re-delivered. Pulsar also offers features for effectively-once processing: it has automatic message deduplication on the broker side and introduced transactions for true end-to-end exactly-once semantics in complex workflows. In this post, we’ll explain how acknowledgments work in Pulsar (individual vs cumulative acks), how Pulsar handles redeliveries and duplicates, and how you can achieve “exactly-once” delivery guarantees using Pulsar’s features (which is something neither RabbitMQ nor JMS natively provide without external coordination).",[39,1098,1100],{"id":1099},"understanding-at-least-once-delivery-in-pulsar","Understanding At-Least-Once Delivery in Pulsar",[47,1102,1103],{},"By default, Pulsar follows an at-least-once delivery model. This means every message sent to Pulsar will be delivered to consumers at least once. It might be delivered more than once in some failure scenarios, but Pulsar will never intentionally drop a message that hasn’t been acknowledged. Let’s break down what that means:",[337,1105,1106,1109,1112,1115],{},[340,1107,1108],{},"When a message is published to a Pulsar topic, it’s stored durably (on disk via BookKeeper) and added to each subscription’s backlog.",[340,1110,1111],{},"A consumer receives the message and processes it. Until the consumer sends an acknowledgment back to the broker, that message remains in the backlog marked as “unacknowledged”.",[340,1113,1114],{},"If the consumer fails to ack (e.g., it crashes or times out), the broker will re-deliver that message (either to the same consumer once it reconnects, or to another consumer if using a shared subscription).",[340,1116,1117],{},"Because of this re-delivery on no-ack, the consumer might end up seeing the same message again – hence “at least once”.",[47,1119,1120],{},"This is analogous to how RabbitMQ works when you use manual acknowledgments (basic_ack). If a RabbitMQ consumer dies before acking, RabbitMQ will requeue and redeliver the message to another consumer (or the same one when it comes back), resulting in a potential duplicate delivery to the application. JMS similarly, in CLIENT_ACK or transactional sessions, will redeliver unacked messages on restart or rollback.",[47,1122,1123],{},"Pulsar’s ack mechanism: In Pulsar, an acknowledgment is an explicit signal. The default mode in the client API is manual ack – your consumer code calls consumer.acknowledge(messageId) (or acknowledges cumulatively, which we’ll discuss shortly). Pulsar then knows it can mark that message as processed. Only after acking does Pulsar consider the message permanently done for that subscription. Until then, it’s retained.",[47,1125,1126],{},"Now, how long will Pulsar wait to redeliver if a consumer doesn’t ack? Pulsar has a concept of acknowledgment timeout. If you set an ack timeout on the consumer (say 30 seconds), then if the consumer hasn’t acked a given message within 30s of receiving it, the broker considers that consumer “stuck” and will try delivering that message to another consumer (in a shared subscription scenario) or the same consumer again. The message is not removed until acknowledged. If ack timeout is not set, Pulsar will only redeliver on certain events like the client disconnecting. Additionally, a consumer can explicitly negative-ack a message (tell the broker “I’ve failed to process this, please redeliver sooner”) to speed up re-delivery without waiting for a timeout.",[39,1128,1130],{"id":1129},"cumulative-vs-individual-acknowledgments","Cumulative vs Individual Acknowledgments",[47,1132,1133],{},"Pulsar has a feature JMS does not: cumulative acknowledgment. This is a bit like saying “I acknowledge everything up to message X”. It’s useful for high throughput when you process messages in order and want to reduce ack traffic. For example, if a consumer receives messages 1,2,3,...10 sequentially, instead of sending ten separate acks, it could send one cumulative ack for message 10, which signals to the broker “messages 1 through 10 are all acknowledged”. This only works in subscription modes where ordering is guaranteed (exclusive or failover subs) and not in shared mode (because shared mode might deliver out-of-order across consumers). It’s an optimization detail, but good to know Pulsar supports it.",[47,1135,1136],{},"Individual ack is the normal mode: ack each message as you process it, which you’d do in a shared subscription or any scenario where you might skip around.",[47,1138,1139],{},"Negative ack (nack): Pulsar consumers can send a negative acknowledgment for a message they failed to process, prompting immediate re-delivery (instead of waiting for a timeout). RabbitMQ has a similar concept: basic.nack\u002Fbasic.reject to requeue or dead-letter a message. JMS typically would rely on not acknowledging or rolling back to signal failure.",[39,1141,1143],{"id":1142},"at-most-once-mode","At-Most-Once Mode?",[47,1145,1146],{},"At-most-once would mean a message is either delivered once or not at all (no duplicates, but possibly dropped on failure). Pulsar by design doesn’t drop messages without ack. However, if you wanted at-most-once behavior (for example, maybe you don’t care if the message is lost on failure, but you want to avoid duplicates at all cost), the way to approximate that is to enable auto-ack (so the client acks as soon as it receives a message, before processing). In that case, if the app crashes during processing, the message was already acked and will not be redelivered – so you might have lost it (didn’t finish processing) = at-most-once. But that’s usually not what you want for reliable systems. Pulsar defaults to at-least-once to favor reliability.",[39,1148,1150],{"id":1149},"dealing-with-duplicates-effective-exactly-once-processing","Dealing with Duplicates: Effective “Exactly-Once” Processing",[47,1152,1153],{},"Pure exactly-once delivery (where the messaging system guarantees a message is never delivered more than once to any consumer) is a hard problem in distributed systems, especially without heavy transactional coordination. Neither RabbitMQ nor JMS brokers guarantee exactly-once delivery to consumers out of the box – they guarantee at-least-once, and it’s up to the consumer to handle deduplicating if needed.",[47,1155,1156],{},"Pulsar’s improvements: Pulsar provides a couple of features to minimize duplicates:",[1158,1159,1160,1163],"ol",{},[340,1161,1162],{},"Message Deduplication on the broker: Pulsar brokers can detect and eliminate duplicates that occur due to producer retries. For example, if a producer sends the same message again (maybe it didn’t get an ack and retried), Pulsar can discard the duplicate if it has the same unique sequence ID from that producer. This is a server-side dedup so that the topic doesn’t even get the duplicate persisted. To use it, you enable broker deduplication (and the producer must either provide sequence IDs or let Pulsar auto-assign them). This is great for preventing the classic duplicate that happens when a producer retry goes through (e.g., network glitch causing the producer to think message wasn’t sent and send it again). Pulsar will store a small cache of recent message IDs to compare and drop dups. RabbitMQ doesn’t have an equivalent feature – if a producer re-sends, Rabbit will just queue it again, so consumers may see duplicates if the producer logic doesn’t handle it. JMS doesn’t standardize this either (some JMS brokers have “duplicate delivery check” features, but not universal).",[340,1164,1165],{},"Transactions and Exactly-Once Semantics: Pulsar introduced a transaction mechanism that allows a producer and consumer to participate in an atomic operation. Essentially, a consumer can consume messages and produce results to another topic within a transaction, and commit it such that either both the ack and the new message publish happen or neither do. With this, Pulsar can achieve end-to-end exactly-once in a pipeline (e.g., when using Flink or Pulsar Functions). If the transaction is aborted, Pulsar will roll back (meaning it will not ack the inputs, so they’ll be redelivered, and it will discard any outputs). If committed, it will make sure the ack is persisted and outputs are visible, exactly once. This feature is powerful for streaming jobs that read from a topic and write to another – it prevents duplicates in the output even if the job restarts. Implementing that in RabbitMQ or JMS typically involves external transactions (like using a database as a fence or two-phase commit between the queue and the processing outcome). Pulsar has it built-in for its ecosystem (since 2.8.0).",[47,1167,1168],{},"It’s worth noting that “exactly-once” in messaging is often achieved at the processing level rather than literally one and only one delivery. Pulsar’s documentation talks about “effectively-once” processing, meaning through deduplication + proper design you can ensure each effect (like a database update or a downstream event) happens once. The broker may deliver something twice, but your application or the system deduplicates such that the end result doesn’t double-count.",[47,1170,1171],{},"Where JMS stands: JMS doesn’t guarantee exactly-once delivery either. The closest is if you use JMS in a transacted session, you can get exactly-once processing within that transaction – either you consume and commit (so you won’t see it again) or rollback (so it’s as if you never got it). But that’s still at-least-once at the system level; exactly-once globally requires coordination outside JMS (like the two-phase commit with XA if integrating with a database).",[39,1173,1175],{"id":1174},"handling-acknowledgments-in-practice","Handling Acknowledgments in Practice",[47,1177,1178],{},"RabbitMQ users: Think of Pulsar’s ack like basic_ack. You should ack after you’ve processed the message. If you fail to process, you can either not ack (and allow redelivery) or negative ack (to expedite requeue). There’s no direct equivalent of RabbitMQ’s basic.reject requeue=false (which dead-letters or drops a message) except to implement a Dead Letter Topic policy or simply ack & drop. We’ll cover Dead Letter Topics in the next post, but basically, Pulsar can automatically route messages that keep failing to a special “DLQ” topic after a max redelivery count.",[47,1180,1181],{},"JMS users: Pulsar’s manual ack is like CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode (where you call message.acknowledge()). If you used AUTO_ACK in JMS, then to replicate that you’d just call ack as soon as you get the message or use a listener that auto-acks. Pulsar doesn’t have the concept of DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE (which JMS had for potentially lazy acks). And for JMS transacted sessions, the analogy would be using Pulsar transactions if you truly need atomic consume+produce. But for most cases, you commit processing by acking the message.",[47,1183,1184],{},"A nice thing about Pulsar: acknowledgments can be asynchronous (non-blocking). When you call consumer.acknowledgeAsync(msgId), the client will send the ack to broker in the background while your code can move on. This helps keep throughput high (you don’t wait for an ack round-trip each time).",[39,1186,1188],{"id":1187},"exactly-once-processing-with-pulsar-a-quick-example","Exactly-Once Processing with Pulsar: A Quick Example",[47,1190,1191],{},"To illustrate how Pulsar can do what others can’t, let’s outline a scenario:",[47,1193,1194],{},"Suppose we have a system that reads messages from an “input” topic, does some transformation, and writes to an “output” topic. We want to ensure that each input message results in exactly one output message, even if crashes happen.",[47,1196,1197],{},"Using plain at-least-once, if our consumer processes a message and publishes the result, but crashes before acking, Pulsar will redeliver that input message and the consumer will process it again, producing a duplicate output. How to avoid that?",[337,1199,1200],{},[340,1201,1202],{},"With Pulsar Transactions: We can start a Pulsar transaction, consume the message, produce the output message within the transaction, then commit the transaction. Pulsar will ensure the ack for input and the publish for output are atomic. If crash happens before commit, none of it is visible (so no ack, input will replay, but also no output published). If commit succeeds, input is acked and output is published once. This way, the output topic will not have duplicates, and input won’t be reprocessed erroneously.",[47,1204,1205],{},"Without transactions, one could still achieve idempotency by including a unique identifier from the input in the output and having consumers or downstream deduplicate, but that’s more work on the user side. Pulsar’s transactions aim to handle it in the messaging layer.",[47,1207,1208],{},"It’s advanced and currently used with frameworks like Flink for exactly-once streaming jobs. For many use cases, enabling broker deduplication is sufficient to avoid producer-side duplicates, and carefully handling consumer logic (so it can tolerate the rare duplicate by ignoring if it sees one) achieves effectively-once processing.",[39,1210,1212],{"id":1211},"acknowledgment-api-summary","Acknowledgment API Summary",[47,1214,1215],{},"Here’s a quick summary of Pulsar acknowledgment-related APIs and features:",[337,1217,1218,1221,1224,1227,1230,1233,1236,1239],{},[340,1219,1220],{},"consumer.acknowledge(msgId) – ack a single message.",[340,1222,1223],{},"consumer.acknowledgeCumulative(msgId) – ack this and all earlier messages in the subscription (only for ordered subs) in one go.",[340,1225,1226],{},"consumer.negativeAcknowledge(msgId) – signal a failure on this message; broker will redeliver it after a short delay (by default).",[340,1228,1229],{},"Ack timeout (set via ConsumerBuilder.ackTimeout(duration)) – if set, broker will automatically treat unacked messages as needing redelivery after this timeout.",[340,1231,1232],{},"By default, no ack timeout is set, so broker waits indefinitely until the consumer dies or negative acks.",[340,1234,1235],{},"Pulsar will mark acknowledged messages as deletable. If all subscriptions ack a message, it’s removed from storage (unless retention is keeping it for some time).",[340,1237,1238],{},"Unacknowledged messages live in the backlog. If a consumer reconnects, it’ll receive those messages.",[340,1240,1241],{},"Exactly-once via transactions: Use the transactional API (PulsarClient.newTransaction) to encompass consume and produce operations. This is a more complex API, not used unless you specifically need it.",[39,1243,1245],{"id":1244},"what-about-ordering-and-redelivery-ordering","What About Ordering and Redelivery Ordering?",[47,1247,1248],{},"One nuance: There is no ordering guarantee for Pulsar’s Shared subscription. If ordering is crucial, you typically would be using an Failover subscription (1 active consumer) or Key_Shared (to maintain per-key order). In those cases, if a message is not acked, you usually stop processing subsequent ones (or use cumulative ack) to maintain order.",[47,1250,1251],{},"Using negative ack on an Exclusive or Failover sub can break ordering if you continue with later messages. So the recommended pattern is, if you care about order, don’t ack out of order. Handle the failure out-of-band (like send to DLQ) or stop consumption until you can ack.",[39,1253,1255],{"id":1254},"key-takeaways","Key Takeaways",[337,1257,1258,1261,1264,1267,1270,1273,1276],{},[340,1259,1260],{},"At-least-once is the default: Pulsar, like RabbitMQ and JMS, will do everything to ensure a message is not lost – storing it until acknowledged. This means duplicates are possible on failures. You should design consumers to handle the occasional duplicate message.",[340,1262,1263],{},"Acks are explicit and crucial: Your Pulsar consumers must acknowledge messages after processing. Until you ack, the broker assumes you haven’t finished and will resend if needed. Pulsar gives you tools like cumulative ack and ack timeouts to manage this efficiently.",[340,1265,1266],{},"No auto-drop: Pulsar won’t drop messages that aren’t acked (unless you explicitly configure a TTL). There’s no equivalent of JMS’s Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE where messages are implicitly acked upon receipt – in Pulsar, ack happens when you call it (or if using a listener, when the framework acks after your callback returns).",[340,1268,1269],{},"Duplicates mitigation: Pulsar broker can deduplicate messages on the producer side when enabled, eliminating duplicates caused by producer retries. This is something RabbitMQ doesn’t do internally.",[340,1271,1272],{},"Exactly-once capabilities: Pulsar is one of the few messaging systems in its class that provides a transactional mechanism for true exactly-once delivery in complex workflows. This is advanced and typically used with stream processing frameworks, but it’s there. For simpler cases, you can often reach “effectively-once” by using deduplication and careful consumer design.",[340,1274,1275],{},"Comparison to RabbitMQ\u002FJMS transactions: RabbitMQ’s handling of acknowledgments is simpler (it has no multi-message transactions beyond acknowledging multiple deliveries in one go). JMS has the notion of sessions and transactions, but coordinating an exactly-once outcome often required XA transactions with an external resource. Pulsar’s built-in transaction support and end-to-end exactly-once for consume-process-produce scenarios is a step beyond what traditional brokers offer, giving Pulsar an edge for building reliable data pipelines.",[340,1277,1278],{},"Negative acks and redelivery: You can signal failures explicitly with negative acks, and Pulsar will requeue the message for redelivery quickly, helping you implement retry logic. This is similar to basic.nack in RabbitMQ.",[47,1280,1281],{},"In summary, Pulsar’s acknowledgment and delivery semantics are robust and similar to what queue veterans expect, with some extra goodies (like dedup and transactions) for those who need that extra level of guarantee. In the next post, we’ll look at how Pulsar’s concept of subscriptions can be used to mimic various queueing patterns, specifically focusing on how Shared and Failover subscription modes work – essentially, how Pulsar “queues” actually operate under the hood.",[47,1283,1284],{},"Stay tuned to understand how “Queues are just subscriptions” in Pulsar and how that simplifies scaling and failover.",[47,1286,1287],{},"‍",[207,1289],{},[47,1291,1287],{},[47,1293,1294,1295,1300],{},"Want to go deeper into real-time data and streaming architectures? Join us at the ",[54,1296,1299],{"href":1297,"rel":1298},"https:\u002F\u002Fdatastreaming-summit.org\u002Fevent\u002Fdata-streaming-sf-2025",[263],"Data Streaming Summit San Francisco 2025"," on September 29–30 at the Grand Hyatt at SFO.",[47,1302,1303],{},"30+ sessions | 4 tracks | Real-world insights from OpenAI, Netflix, LinkedIn, Paypal, Uber, AWS, Google, Motorq, Databricks, Ververica, Confluent & more!",[47,1305,1306],{},[54,1307,1310],{"href":1308,"rel":1309},"https:\u002F\u002Fdatastreaming-summit.org\u002Fevent\u002Fdata-streaming-sf-2025\u002Fschedule",[263],"[Explore the Full Agenda]",[47,1312,1313],{},[54,1314,1317],{"href":1315,"rel":1316},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.eventbrite.com\u002Fe\u002Fdata-streaming-summit-san-francisco-2025-tickets-1432401484399?aff=oddtdtcreator",[263],"[Register Now]",[47,1319,1287],{},{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1321},[1322,1323,1324,1325,1326,1327,1328,1329,1330],{"id":1099,"depth":18,"text":1100},{"id":1129,"depth":18,"text":1130},{"id":1142,"depth":18,"text":1143},{"id":1149,"depth":18,"text":1150},{"id":1174,"depth":18,"text":1175},{"id":1187,"depth":18,"text":1188},{"id":1211,"depth":18,"text":1212},{"id":1244,"depth":18,"text":1245},{"id":1254,"depth":18,"text":1255},"Apache Pulsar","2025-08-06","Learn about Pulsar's message delivery guarantees, from at-least-once to effectively-once processing, and how it handles acknowledgments, redeliveries, and duplicates, with comparisons to RabbitMQ and JMS.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F689cad93a3e3355c0da233ee_03.-At-Least-Once,-Exactly-Once,-and-Acks-in-Pulsar-1.png",{},"\u002Fblog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar","8 min read",{"title":1086,"description":1333},"blog\u002Fat-least-once-exactly-once-and-acks-in-pulsar",[1331,1341,1342],"Intro","RabbitMQ","JhOgW9g9if7QRbReh5KgVAnq8uv_uDVX14hEVAaiYho",[1345,1361,1375],{"id":1346,"title":311,"bioSummary":1347,"email":10,"extension":8,"image":1348,"linkedinUrl":1349,"meta":1350,"position":1357,"stem":1358,"twitterUrl":1359,"__hash__":1360},"authors\u002Fauthors\u002Fpenghui-li.md","Penghui Li is passionate about helping organizations to architect and implement messaging services. Prior to StreamNative, Penghui was a Software Engineer at Zhaopin.com, where he was the leading Pulsar advocate and helped the company adopt and implement the technology. He is an Apache Pulsar Committer and PMC member.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fauthors\u002Fpenghui-li.webp","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.linkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fpenghui-li-244173184\u002F",{"body":1351},{"type":14,"value":1352,"toc":1355},[1353],[47,1354,1347],{},{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1356},[],"Director of Streaming, StreamNative & Apache Pulsar PMC Member","authors\u002Fpenghui-li","https:\u002F\u002Ftwitter.com\u002Flipenghui6","WDjET7GfxqVQJ8mTEMaRhgpxRdDy18qZkgQDJlwjvbI",{"id":1362,"title":310,"bioSummary":1363,"email":10,"extension":8,"image":1364,"linkedinUrl":10,"meta":1365,"position":1372,"stem":1373,"twitterUrl":10,"__hash__":1374},"authors\u002Fauthors\u002Fhang.md","Hang Chen, an Apache Pulsar and BookKeeper PMC member, is Director of Storage at StreamNative, where he leads the design of next-generation storage architectures and Lakehouse integrations. His work delivers scalable, high-performance infrastructure powering modern cloud-native event streaming platforms.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fauthors\u002Fhang.webp",{"body":1366},{"type":14,"value":1367,"toc":1370},[1368],[47,1369,1363],{},{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1371},[],"Director of Storage, StreamNative & Apache Pulsar PMC Member","authors\u002Fhang","titaSDxZRJWAW0SkpJSq43NuDvps9XQ6gZIMSPCtUwo",{"id":1376,"title":309,"bioSummary":1377,"email":10,"extension":8,"image":1378,"linkedinUrl":10,"meta":1379,"position":1388,"stem":1389,"twitterUrl":1390,"__hash__":1391},"authors\u002Fauthors\u002Fneng-lu.md","Neng Lu is currently the Director of Platform at StreamNative, where he leads the engineering team in developing the StreamNative ONE Platform and the next-generation Ursa engine. As an Apache Pulsar Committer, he specializes in advancing Pulsar Functions and Pulsar IO Connectors, contributing to the evolution of real-time data streaming technologies. Prior to joining StreamNative, Neng was a Senior Software Engineer at Twitter, where he focused on the Heron project, a cutting-edge real-time computing framework. He holds a Master's degree in Computer Science from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and a Bachelor's degree from Zhejiang University.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fauthors\u002Fneng-lu.jpeg",{"body":1380},{"type":14,"value":1381,"toc":1386},[1382,1384],[47,1383,1377],{},[47,1385,1287],{},{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1387},[],"Director of Engineering, StreamNative","authors\u002Fneng-lu","https:\u002F\u002Ftwitter.com\u002Fnlu90","R1K8DYRoq92ZrwHOmKtJMRfm-cuTjXTqAv0Cc3Q9IM4",[1393,1401,1405],{"path":1394,"title":1395,"date":1396,"image":1397,"link":-1,"collection":1398,"resourceType":1399,"score":1400,"id":1394},"\u002Fblog\u002Fqueues-are-just-subscriptions-demystifying-shared-and-failover-modes","Queues Are Just Subscriptions: Demystifying Shared and Failover Modes (Pulsar Guide for RabbitMQ\u002FJMS Engineers 4\u002F10)","2025-08-28","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F68b093978d9ff520a3aa4955_04.-Queues-Are-Just-Subscriptions.png","blogs","Blog",1,{"path":1402,"title":1403,"date":1332,"image":1404,"link":-1,"collection":1398,"resourceType":1399,"score":1400,"id":1402},"\u002Fblog\u002Fgoodbye-exchanges-how-pulsar-replaces-fanout-routing-and-headers","Goodbye Exchanges: How Pulsar Replaces Fanout, Routing, and Headers (Pulsar Guide for RabbitMQ\u002FJMS Engineers 2\u002F10)","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F689360cf7196382ef51fb769_02.-Replaces-Fanout,-Routing,-and-Headers-with-Pulsar.png",{"path":1406,"title":1407,"date":1408,"image":1409,"link":-1,"collection":1398,"resourceType":1399,"score":1400,"id":1406},"\u002Fblog\u002Fpulsar-101-for-queue-users-queues-topics-and-subscriptions-explained","Pulsar 101 for Queue Users: Queues, Topics, and Subscriptions Explained (Pulsar Guide for RabbitMQ\u002FJMS Engineers 1\u002F10)","2025-08-04","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F6890c928669a9565ea05e386_01.-Pulsar-101-for-Queue-Users.png",1775235682473]