[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1447},["ShallowReactive",2],{"active-banner":3,"navbar-featured-partner-blog":23,"navbar-pricing-featured":304,"blog-\u002Fblog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar":1084,"blog-authors-\u002Fblog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar":1413,"related-\u002Fblog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar":1427},{"id":4,"title":5,"date":6,"dismissible":7,"extension":8,"link":9,"link2":10,"linkText":11,"linkText2":10,"meta":12,"stem":20,"variant":21,"__hash__":22},"banners\u002Fbanners\u002Fkafka-company-2025.md","Native Apache Kafka Service Is Coming Soon to StreamNative Cloud. Join the waitlist and get $1,000 in credits.","2026-04-01",true,"md","\u002Fnative-kafka-service-waitlist",null,"Join Waitlist",{"body":13},{"type":14,"value":15,"toc":16},"minimark",[],{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":19},"",2,[],"banners\u002Fkafka-company-2025","default","IMIJszQOOWTfA_DV33eYUA5jqV7DrX1FWbBTBZfNvWc",{"id":24,"title":25,"authors":26,"body":28,"category":288,"createdAt":10,"date":289,"description":290,"extension":8,"featured":7,"image":291,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":293,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":295,"readingTime":296,"relatedResources":10,"seo":297,"stem":298,"tags":299,"__hash__":303},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025.md","StreamNative Recognized as a Contender in The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",[27],"David Kjerrumgaard",{"type":14,"value":29,"toc":275},[30,38,46,50,66,72,77,80,86,101,108,114,117,123,126,133,139,142,145,156,162,168,171,174,177,183,190,193,196,203,206,209,223,228,232,236,240,244,248,250,267,269],[31,32,34],"h3",{"id":33},"receives-highest-possible-scores-in-both-the-messaging-and-resource-optimization-criteria",[35,36,37],"em",{},"Receives Highest Possible Scores in BOTH the Messaging and Resource Optimization Criteria",[39,40,42],"h2",{"id":41},"introduction",[43,44,45],"strong",{},"Introduction",[47,48,49],"p",{},"Real-time data has become the backbone of modern innovation. As artificial intelligence (AI) and digital services demand instantaneous insights, organizations are realizing that streaming data is no longer optional – it's essential for delivering timely, context-rich experiences. StreamNative's data streaming platform is built precisely for this reality, ensuring data is immediate, reliable, and ready to power critical applications.",[47,51,52,53,62,63],{},"Today, we're excited to announce that Forrester Research has named StreamNative as a Contender in its evaluation, ",[54,55,57],"a",{"href":56},"\u002Freports\u002Frecognized-in-the-forrester-wave-tm-streaming-data-platforms-q4-2025",[35,58,59],{},[43,60,61],{},"The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",". This report evaluated 15 top streaming data platform providers, and we're proud to share that ",[43,64,65],{},"StreamNative received the highest scores possible—5 out of 5—in both the Messaging and Resource Optimization criteria.",[47,67,68,69],{},"***Forrester's Take: ***",[35,70,71],{},"\"StreamNative is a good fit for enterprises that want an Apache Pulsar implementation that is also compatible with Kafka APIs.\"",[47,73,74],{},[35,75,76],{},"— The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025",[47,78,79],{},"Being recognized in the Forrester Wave is a proud milestone, and for us, it highlights how far StreamNative has come in enabling enterprises to unlock the power of real-time data. In the sections below, we'll dive into what we believe sets StreamNative apart—from our modern architecture and cloud-native design to our open-source foundation and real-time use cases—and how we see these strengths aligning with Forrester's findings.",[39,81,83],{"id":82},"trusted-by-industry-leaders",[43,84,85],{},"Trusted by Industry Leaders",[47,87,88,89,92,93,96,97,100],{},"Companies across industries are already leveraging StreamNative to drive real-time outcomes. Global enterprises like ",[43,90,91],{},"Cisco"," rely on StreamNative to handle massive IoT telemetry, supporting 245 million+ connected devices. Martech leaders such as ",[43,94,95],{},"Iterable"," process billions of events per day with StreamNative for hyper-personalized customer engagement. And in financial services, ",[43,98,99],{},"FICO"," trusts StreamNative to power its real-time fraud detection and analytics pipelines with a secure, scalable streaming backbone.",[47,102,103,104,107],{},"The Forrester report notes that, “",[35,105,106],{},"Customers appreciate the lower infrastructure costs that result from StreamNative’s cost-efficient, Kafka-compatible architecture. Customers note excellent support responsiveness…","”",[39,109,111],{"id":110},"modern-cloud-native-architecture-built-for-scale",[43,112,113],{},"Modern, Cloud-Native Architecture Built for Scale",[47,115,116],{},"From day one, StreamNative was designed with a modern architecture to meet the demanding scale and flexibility requirements of real-time data. Unlike legacy streaming systems that often rely on tightly coupled storage and compute, StreamNative's platform takes a cloud-native approach: it decouples these layers to enable elastic scalability and efficient resource utilization across any environment. The core is powered by Apache Pulsar—a distributed messaging and streaming engine—enhanced with multi-protocol support (including native Apache Kafka API compatibility) to unify diverse data streams under one roof. This means organizations can consolidate siloed messaging systems and handle both high-volume event streams and traditional message queues on a single platform, without sacrificing performance or reliability.",[47,118,119,120,107],{},"Forrester's evaluation described that “",[35,121,122],{},"StreamNative aims to provide a high-performance, multi-protocol streaming data platform: It uses Apache Pulsar with Kafka API compatibility to deliver cost-efficient, real-time applications for enterprises. It appeals to organizations that want a flexible, low-cost streaming solution, due to its focus on scalability and resource optimization, while its investments in Pulsar’s open-source ecosystem and performance optimization make it the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar.",[47,124,125],{},"Our cloud-first, leaderless architecture (with no single broker bottlenecks) and tiered storage model were built to maximize throughput and cost-efficiency for real-time workloads. By separating compute from storage and leveraging distributed object storage, StreamNative can retain huge volumes of event data indefinitely while keeping compute costs in check—effectively providing a flexible, low-cost streaming solution.",[47,127,128,129,132],{},"This modern design not only delivers high performance, but also ensures fault tolerance and geo-distribution out of the box, so enterprises can trust their streaming data is always available and durable. As Forrester’s evaluation noted, StreamNative ",[35,130,131],{},"\"excels at messaging and resource optimization\" and “Its platform supports use cases like real-time analytics and event-driven architectures with robust scalability.","” Our architecture provides the strong foundation that today's real-time applications demand, from ultra-fast data ingestion to seamless scale-out across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.",[39,134,136],{"id":135},"open-source-foundation-and-pulsar-expertise",[43,137,138],{},"Open Source Foundation and Pulsar Expertise",[47,140,141],{},"StreamNative's DNA is rooted in open source innovation. Our founders are the original creators of Apache Pulsar, and we've built our platform with the same open principles: freedom, flexibility, and community-driven innovation. For developers and data teams, this means adopting StreamNative comes with no proprietary lock-in—instead, you get a platform built on open standards and a thriving ecosystem. We offer broad API compatibility (Pulsar, Kafka, JMS, MQTT, and more) so that teams can work with familiar interfaces and integrate StreamNative into existing systems with ease.",[47,143,144],{},"StreamNative is the primary commercial contributor to the Apache Pulsar project and its surrounding ecosystem. We invest heavily in Pulsar's ongoing improvements our investments in Pulsar's open-source ecosystem and performance optimization bolster StreamNative's value. We also foster a vibrant community through initiatives like the Data Streaming Summit and free training resources.",[47,146,147,148,151,152,155],{},"Forrester's assessment noted that StreamNative’s “",[35,149,150],{},"events-driven agents, extensibility, and performance architecture are solid,","” and we're continuing to build on that foundation. ",[43,153,154],{},"We're actively investing in expanding our tooling for observability, governance, schema management, and developer productivity","—areas we recognize as critical for enterprise adoption and where we're committed to accelerating our roadmap.",[47,157,158,159],{},"Being open also means embracing an open ecosystem of technologies. StreamNative actively integrates with the tools and platforms that matter most to our users. We partner with industry leaders like Snowflake, Databricks, Google, and Ververica to ensure our streaming platform works seamlessly with data warehouses, lakehouse storage, and stream processing frameworks. Forrester’s evaluation observed that StreamNative’s ",[35,160,161],{},"\"investments in Pulsar’s open-source ecosystem and performance optimization make it the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar.\"",[39,163,165],{"id":164},"powering-real-time-use-cases-across-industries",[43,166,167],{},"Powering Real-Time Use Cases Across Industries",[47,169,170],{},"One of the greatest validations of StreamNative's approach is the success our customers are achieving with real-time data. StreamNative's platform is versatile and use-case agnostic—if an application demands high-volume, low-latency data movement, we can power it. This flexibility is why our customer base spans industries from finance and IoT to major automobile manufacturers and online gaming. The common thread is that these organizations need to process and react to data in milliseconds, and StreamNative is delivering the capabilities to make that possible.",[47,172,173],{},"Cisco uses StreamNative to underpin an IoT telemetry system of colossal scale, connecting hundreds of millions of devices and thousands of enterprise clients with real-time data streams. The platform's multi-tenant design and proven reliability allow Cisco to offer its customers a live feed of device data with unwavering confidence. In the financial sector, FICO has built streaming pipelines on StreamNative to detect fraud as transactions happen and to monitor systems in real time. With StreamNative's strong guarantees around message durability and ordering, FICO can catch anomalies or suspicious patterns within seconds. And in digital customer engagement, Iterable relies on StreamNative to process billions of events every day—clicks, views, purchases—so that marketers can trigger personalized campaigns instantly based on user behavior.",[47,175,176],{},"Our customers uniformly deal with mission-critical data streams, where downtime or delays are unacceptable. StreamNative's fault-tolerant, scalable infrastructure has proven equal to the task, handling scenarios like bursting to millions of events per second or seamlessly spanning multiple cloud regions. Forrester's report recognized StreamNative for supporting event-driven architectures with robust scalability—which for us is a reflection of our platform's ability to meet the most demanding enterprise requirements.",[39,178,180],{"id":179},"continuing-to-innovate-ursa-orca-and-the-road-ahead",[43,181,182],{},"Continuing to Innovate: Ursa, Orca, and the Road Ahead",[47,184,185,186,189],{},"While we are thrilled to be recognized in Forrester's Streaming Data Platforms Wave, we view this as just the beginning. StreamNative's vision has always been bold: to ",[43,187,188],{},"provide a unified platform that not only handles today's streaming needs but also anticipates the emerging requirements of tomorrow",".",[47,191,192],{},"One key area of focus is the convergence of streaming data with advanced analytics and AI. As Forrester points out in the report, technology leaders should look for platforms that natively integrate messaging, stream processing, and analytics to provide AI agents with real-time, contextualized information. We couldn't agree more. Our award-winning Ursa Engine and Orca Agent Engine are aimed at extending our platform up the stack—bridging the gap between data streams and data lakes, and between event streams and intelligent processing.",[47,194,195],{},"Our new Ursa Engine introduces a lakehouse-native approach to streaming: it can write events directly to table formats like Iceberg on cloud storage, eliminating entire classes of ETL jobs and making fresh data instantly available for analytics queries. By integrating streaming and lakehouse technologies, we help customers collapse data silos and accelerate their AI\u002FML pipelines.",[47,197,198,199,202],{},"Beyond analytics integration, we are also enhancing StreamNative with more out-of-the-box processing and governance capabilities. In the coming months, we plan to introduce new features for lightweight stream processing and transformation, making it easier to build reactive applications directly on the platform. We're also expanding our ecosystem of connectors and integrations, so that whether your data lands in Snowflake, Databricks, or an AI model, StreamNative will seamlessly feed it. ",[43,200,201],{},"We're investing significantly in enterprise features including security, schema registry, governance, and monitoring tooling","—capabilities that are essential for mission-critical deployments and where we're committed to continued improvement.",[47,204,205],{},"This recognition from Forrester energizes us to keep innovating at full speed. We're sharing this honor with our amazing customers, community, and partners who drive us forward every day. Your feedback and real-world challenges have helped shape StreamNative into what it is today, and together, we will shape the future of streaming data. Thank you for joining us on this journey—we're just getting started, and we can't wait to deliver even more value as we continue to evolve our platform. Onward to real-time everything!",[207,208],"hr",{},[31,210,212],{"id":211},"streamnative-in-the-forrester-wave-evaluation-findings",[43,213,214,215,222],{},"StreamNative in ",[43,216,217],{},[54,218,219],{"href":56},[43,220,221],{},"The Forrester Wave™",": Evaluation Findings",[224,225,227],"h5",{"id":226},"recognized-as-a-contender-among-15-streaming-data-platform-providers","• Recognized as a Contender among 15 streaming data platform providers",[224,229,231],{"id":230},"received-the-highest-scores-possible-50-in-both-the-messaging-and-resource-optimization-criteria","* Received the highest scores possible (5.0) in both the Messaging and Resource Optimization criteria",[224,233,235],{"id":234},"cited-as-the-primary-platform-for-enterprises-wishing-to-implement-pulsar","• Cited as the primary platform for enterprises wishing to implement Pulsar",[224,237,239],{"id":238},"noted-for-excelling-at-messaging-and-resource-optimization","• Noted for excelling at messaging and resource optimization",[224,241,243],{"id":242},"customers-cited-lower-infrastructure-costs-and-excellent-support-responsiveness","• Customers cited lower infrastructure costs and excellent support responsiveness",[224,245,247],{"id":246},"recognized-for-supporting-event-driven-architectures-with-robust-scalability","• Recognized for supporting event-driven architectures with robust scalability",[207,249],{},[251,252,254,255,258,259,189],"h6",{"id":253},"forrester-disclaimer-forrester-does-not-endorse-any-company-product-brand-or-service-included-in-its-research-publications-and-does-not-advise-any-person-to-select-the-products-or-services-of-any-company-or-brand-based-on-the-ratings-included-in-such-publications-information-is-based-on-the-best-available-resources-opinions-reflect-judgment-at-the-time-and-are-subject-to-change-for-more-information-read-about-forresters-objectivity-here","**Forrester Disclaimer: **",[35,256,257],{},"Forrester does not endorse any company, product, brand, or service included in its research publications and does not advise any person to select the products or services of any company or brand based on the ratings included in such publications. Information is based on the best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change",". *For more information, read about Forrester’s objectivity *",[54,260,264],{"href":261,"rel":262},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.forrester.com\u002Fabout-us\u002Fobjectivity\u002F",[263],"nofollow",[35,265,266],{},"here",[207,268],{},[251,270,272],{"id":271},"apache-apache-pulsar-apache-kafka-apache-flink-and-other-names-are-trademarks-of-the-apache-software-foundation-no-endorsement-by-apache-or-other-third-parties-is-implied",[35,273,274],{},"Apache®, Apache Pulsar®, Apache Kafka®, Apache Flink® and other names are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation. No endorsement by Apache or other third parties is implied.",{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":276},[277,279,280,281,282,283,284],{"id":33,"depth":278,"text":37},3,{"id":41,"depth":18,"text":45},{"id":82,"depth":18,"text":85},{"id":110,"depth":18,"text":113},{"id":135,"depth":18,"text":138},{"id":164,"depth":18,"text":167},{"id":179,"depth":18,"text":182,"children":285},[286],{"id":211,"depth":278,"text":287},"StreamNative in The Forrester Wave™: Evaluation Findings","Company","2025-12-16","StreamNative is recognized in The Forrester Wave™: Streaming Data Platforms, Q4 2025. Discover why Forrester highlights StreamNative's high-performance messaging, efficient resource use, and cost-effective Kafka API compatibility for real-time innovation.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F693bd36cf01b217dcb67278f_Streamnative_blog_thumbnail.png",false,{},0,"\u002Fblog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025","10 mins read",{"title":25,"description":290},"blog\u002Fstreamnative-recognized-in-the-forrester-wave-streaming-data-platforms-2025",[300,301,302],"Announcements","Real-Time","Forrester","sOeeJtEO3O-IIfTPJjY1AFOMawZ_rf8FOH8A98NEKgU",{"id":305,"title":306,"authors":307,"body":312,"category":1071,"createdAt":10,"date":1072,"description":1073,"extension":8,"featured":7,"image":1074,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":1075,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":1076,"readingTime":1077,"relatedResources":10,"seo":1078,"stem":1079,"tags":1080,"__hash__":1083},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour.md","How We Run a 5 GB\u002Fs Kafka Workload for Just $50 per Hour",[308,309,310,311],"Matteo Meril","Neng Lu","Hang Chen","Penghui Li",{"type":14,"value":313,"toc":1041},[314,317,320,323,326,329,333,336,346,352,355,363,368,372,379,382,385,393,397,400,405,409,412,415,418,421,430,434,437,448,451,455,458,461,472,475,479,483,491,494,498,506,535,539,542,547,551,554,558,561,564,569,578,583,586,589,600,604,607,618,622,625,628,633,636,665,669,671,677,680,685,690,693,697,711,715,726,730,745,754,765,768,771,775,778,781,792,795,798,801,806,811,815,819,836,840,854,859,863,874,877,893,897,908,913,918,926,930,933,937,944,948,951,960,965,974,980,989,998,1007,1016,1025,1033],[47,315,316],{},"The rise of DeepSeek has shaken the AI infrastructure market, forcing companies to confront the escalating costs of training and deploying AI models. But the real pressure point isn’t just compute—it’s data acquisition and ingestion costs.",[47,318,319],{},"As businesses rethink their AI cost-containment strategies, real-time data streaming is emerging as a critical enabler. The growing adoption of Kafka as a standard protocol has expanded cost-efficient options, allowing companies to optimize streaming analytics while keeping expenses in check.",[47,321,322],{},"Ursa, the data streaming engine powering StreamNative’s managed Kafka service, is built for this new reality. With its leaderless architecture and native lakehouse storage integration, Ursa eliminates costly inter-zone network traffic for data replication and client-to-broker communication while ensuring high availability at minimal operational cost.",[47,324,325],{},"In this blog post, we benchmarked the infrastructure cost and total cost of ownership (TCO) for running a 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workload across different Kafka vendors, including Redpanda, Confluent WarpStream, and AWS MSK. Our benchmark results show that Ursa can sustain 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workloads at just 5% of the cost of traditional streaming engines like Redpanda—making it the ideal solution for high-performance, cost-efficient ingestion and data streaming for data lakehouses and AI workloads.",[47,327,328],{},"Note: We also evaluated vanilla Kafka in our benchmark; however, for simplicity, we have focused our cost comparison on vendor solutions rather than self-managed deployments. That said, it is important to highlight that both Redpanda and vanilla Kafka use a leader-based data replication approach. In a data-intensive, network-bound workload like 5GB\u002Fs streaming, with the same machine type and replication factor, Redpanda and vanilla Kafka produced nearly identical cost profiles.",[39,330,332],{"id":331},"key-benchmark-findings","Key Benchmark Findings",[47,334,335],{},"Ursa delivered 5 GB\u002Fs of sustained throughput at an infrastructure cost of just $54 per hour. For comparison:",[337,338,339,343],"ul",{},[340,341,342],"li",{},"MSK: $303 per hour → 5.6x more expensive compared to Ursa",[340,344,345],{},"Redpanda: $988 per hour → 18x more expensive compared to Ursa",[47,347,348],{},[349,350],"img",{"alt":17,"src":351},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c71b67d9046f26edc7977_AD_4nXfvTqyBNUBu2lObdkKAx-5UNkpNP8UYULLZyOcixE6z99VMZUUEsUqWjzexI7vjyNGRNSAUoM9smYvdTP55ctAhIbrs5lmQgcSVMWdaoigbWouCl95DVSQsxooY-qqfGcYqS4g4zA.png",[47,353,354],{},"Beyond infrastructure costs, when factoring in both storage pricing, vendor pricing and operational expenses, Ursa’s total cost of ownership (TCO) for a 5GB\u002Fs workload with a 7-day retention period is:",[337,356,357,360],{},[340,358,359],{},"50% cheaper than Confluent WarpStream",[340,361,362],{},"85% cheaper than MSK and Redpanda",[47,364,365],{},[349,366],{"alt":17,"src":367},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d77e9c706de5343b8_AD_4nXeDv8rrv_C1CTCCiqYo1zpvlGYbdBk1r0VEqovAPu22iFMQZgh54Hfw9PBMLzM7jDFxKwAFDxbdG0np4XVk_tGsWhEKMloLRcmmea7lvueCx-0cFsyaE3Mya4Mxc1Dox95A6JEc.png",[39,369,371],{"id":370},"ursa-highly-cost-efficient-data-streaming-at-scale","Ursa: Highly Cost-Efficient Data Streaming at Scale",[47,373,374,378],{},[54,375,377],{"href":376},"\u002Fblog\u002Fursa-reimagine-apache-kafka-for-the-cost-conscious-data-streaming","Ursa"," is a next-generation data streaming engine designed to deliver high performance at a fraction of the cost of traditional disk-based solutions. It is fully compatible with Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar APIs, while leveraging a leaderless, lakehouse-native architecture to maximize scalability, efficiency, and cost savings.",[47,380,381],{},"Ursa’s key innovation is separating storage from compute and decoupling metadata\u002Findex operations from data operations by utilizing cloud object storage (e.g., AWS S3) instead of costly inter-zone disk-based replication. It also employs open lakehouse formats (Iceberg and Delta Lake), enabling columnar compression to significantly reduce storage costs while maintaining durability and availability.",[47,383,384],{},"In contrast, traditional streaming systems—like Kafka and Redpanda—depend on leader-based architectures, which drive up inter-zone traffic costs due to replication and client communication. Ursa mitigates these costs by:",[337,386,387,390],{},[340,388,389],{},"Eliminating inter-zone traffic costs via a leaderless architecture.",[340,391,392],{},"Replacing costly inter-zone replication with direct writes to cloud storage using open lakehouse formats.",[39,394,396],{"id":395},"how-ursa-eliminates-inter-zone-traffic","How Ursa Eliminates Inter-Zone Traffic",[47,398,399],{},"Ursa minimizes inter-zone traffic by leveraging a leaderless architecture, which eliminates inter-zone communication between clients and brokers, and lakehouse-native storage, which removes the need for inter-zone data replication. This approach ensures high availability and scalability while avoiding unnecessary cross-zone data movement.",[47,401,402],{},[349,403],{"alt":17,"src":404},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602e21b3571bb7117dca_AD_4nXd7Oahc77NjRLNvA9clLt0tsyU6MrIqVibFYv5pW5giTIcCHPr3EA_yTGzfVEUIVO3VXK56qWK8zmBCp5lY0E_4nmlWIPFrHjtHylA5NhwELjn-UB0fLG2h_kbrxrc7Cs_edvveNA.png",[31,406,408],{"id":407},"leaderless-architecture","Leaderless architecture",[47,410,411],{},"Traditional streaming engines such as Kafka, Pulsar, or RedPanda rely on a leader-based model, where each partition is assigned to a single leader broker that handles all writes and reads.",[47,413,414],{},"Pros of Leader-Based Architectures:\n✔ Maintains message ordering via local sequence IDs\n✔ Delivers low latency and high performance through message caching",[47,416,417],{},"Cons of Leader-Based Architectures:\n✖ Throughput bottlenecked by a single broker per partition\n✖ Inter-zone traffic required for high availability in multi-AZ deployments",[47,419,420],{},"While Kafka and Pulsar offer partial solutions (e.g., reading from followers, shadow topics) to reduce read-related inter-zone traffic, producers still send data to a single leader.",[47,422,423,424,429],{},"Ursa removes the concept of topic ownership, allowing any broker in the cluster to handle reads or writes for any partition. The primary challenge—ensuring message ordering—is solved with ",[54,425,428],{"href":426,"rel":427},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fstreamnative\u002Foxia",[263],"Oxia",", a scalable metadata and index service created by StreamNative in 2022.",[31,431,433],{"id":432},"oxia-the-metadata-layer-enabling-leaderless-architecture","Oxia: The Metadata Layer Enabling Leaderless Architecture",[47,435,436],{},"Ensuring message ordering in a leaderless architecture is complex, but Ursa solves this with Oxia:",[337,438,439,442,445],{},[340,440,441],{},"Handles millions of metadata\u002Findex operations per second",[340,443,444],{},"Generates sequential IDs to maintain strict message ordering",[340,446,447],{},"Optimized for Kubernetes with horizontal scalability",[47,449,450],{},"Producers and consumers can connect to any broker within their local AZ, eliminating inter-zone traffic costs while maintaining performance through localized caching.",[31,452,454],{"id":453},"zero-interzone-data-replication","Zero interzone data replication",[47,456,457],{},"In most distributed systems, data replication from a leader (primary) to followers (replicas) is crucial for fault tolerance and availability. However, replication across zones can inflate infrastructure expenses substantially.",[47,459,460],{},"Ursa avoids these costs by writing data directly to cloud storage (e.g., AWS S3, Google GCS):",[337,462,463,466,469],{},[340,464,465],{},"Built-In Resilience: Cloud storage inherently offers high availability and fault tolerance without inter-zone traffic fees.",[340,467,468],{},"Tradeoff: Slightly higher latency (sub-second, with p99 at 500 milliseconds) compared to local disk\u002FEBS (single-digit to sub-100 milliseconds), in exchange for significantly lower costs (up to 10x lower).",[340,470,471],{},"Flexible Modes: Ursa is an addition to the classic BookKeeper-based engine, providing users with the flexibility to optimize for either cost or low latency based on their workload requirements.",[47,473,474],{},"By foregoing conventional replication, Ursa slashes inter-zone traffic costs and associated complexities—making it a compelling option for organizations seeking to balance high-performance data streaming with strict budget constraints.",[39,476,478],{"id":477},"how-we-ran-a-5-gbs-test-with-ursa","How We Ran a 5 GB\u002Fs Test with Ursa",[31,480,482],{"id":481},"ursa-cluster-deployment","Ursa Cluster Deployment",[337,484,485,488],{},[340,486,487],{},"9 brokers across 3 availability zones, each on m6i.8xlarge (Fixed 12.5 Gbps bandwidth, 32 vCPU cores, 128 GB memory).",[340,489,490],{},"Oxia cluster (metadata store) with 3 nodes of m6i.8xlarge, distributed across three availability zones (AZs).",[47,492,493],{},"During peak throughput (5 GB\u002Fs), each broker’s network usage was about 10 Gbps.",[31,495,497],{"id":496},"openmessaging-benchmark-workers-configuration","OpenMessaging Benchmark Workers & Configuration",[47,499,500,501,505],{},"The OpenMessaging Benchmark(OMB) Framework is a suite of tools that make it easy to benchmark distributed messaging systems in the cloud. Please check ",[54,502,503],{"href":503,"rel":504},"https:\u002F\u002Fopenmessaging.cloud\u002Fdocs\u002Fbenchmarks\u002F",[263]," for details.",[337,507,508,523,532],{},[340,509,510,511,516,517,522],{},"12 OMB workers: 6 for ",[54,512,515],{"href":513,"rel":514},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002Fd1094122270775e4f1580947f80c5055",[263],"producers",", 6 for ",[54,518,521],{"href":519,"rel":520},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002F06bada89381fb77a7862e1b4c1d8963d",[263],"consumers"," across 3 availability zones, on m6i.8xlarge instances. Each worker is configured with 12 CPU cores and 48 GB memory.",[340,524,525,526,531],{},"Sample YAML ",[54,527,530],{"href":528,"rel":529},"https:\u002F\u002Fgist.github.com\u002Fcodelipenghui\u002F204c1f26c4d44a218ae235bf2de99904",[263],"scripts"," provided for Kafka-compatible configuration and rate limits.",[340,533,534],{},"Achieved consistent 5 GB\u002Fs publish\u002Fsubscribe throughput.",[39,536,538],{"id":537},"ursa-benchmark-tests-results","Ursa Benchmark Tests & Results",[47,540,541],{},"The following diagram demonstrates that Ursa can consistently handle 5 GB\u002Fs of traffic, fully saturating the network across all broker nodes.",[47,543,544],{},[349,545],{"alt":17,"src":546},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d7b261bac1113f7d6_AD_4nXdDPsRc3koXICiFF0bqSmGWbJt_RlUy4FE3ruuWOfbCfpcqZ1dejjqGbkaCJv2hQFL1nirRouBVRW2l5uMWBvY9naMqGB_wHcLI14dBM0f85TXhmdm3UxEv1yGX9Y4hf5FttSkZew.png",[39,548,550],{"id":549},"comparing-infrastructure-cost","Comparing Infrastructure Cost",[47,552,553],{},"This benchmark first evaluates infrastructure costs of running a 5 GB\u002Fs streaming workload (1:1 producer-to-consumer ratio) across different data streaming engines, including Ursa, Redpanda, and AWS MSK, with a focus on multi-AZ deployments to ensure a fair comparison.",[31,555,557],{"id":556},"test-setup-key-assumptions","Test Setup & Key Assumptions",[47,559,560],{},"All tests use multi-AZ configurations, with clusters and clients distributed across three AWS availability zones (AZs). Cluster size scales proportionally to the number of AZs, and rack-awareness is enabled for all engines to evenly distribute topic partitions and leaders.",[47,562,563],{},"To ensure a fair comparison, we selected the same machine type capable of fully utilizing both network and storage bandwidth for Ursa and Redpanda in this 5GB\u002Fs test:",[337,565,566],{},[340,567,568],{},"9 × m6i.8xlarge instances",[47,570,571,572,577],{},"However, MSK's storage bandwidth limits vary depending on the selected instance type, with the highest allowed limit capped at 1000 MiB\u002Fs per broker, according to",[54,573,576],{"href":574,"rel":575},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.aws.amazon.com\u002Fmsk\u002Flatest\u002Fdeveloperguide\u002Fmsk-provision-throughput-management.html#throughput-bottlenecks",[263]," AWS documentation",". Given this constraint, achieving 5 GB\u002Fs throughput with a replication factor of 3 required the following setup:",[337,579,580],{},[340,581,582],{},"15 × kafka.m7g.8xlarge (32 vCPUs, 128 GB memory, 15 Gbps network, 4000 GiB EBS).",[47,584,585],{},"This configuration was necessary to work around MSK's storage bandwidth limitations, ensuring a comparable cost basis to other evaluated streaming engines.",[47,587,588],{},"Additional key assumptions include:",[337,590,591,594,597],{},[340,592,593],{},"Inter-AZ producer traffic: For leader-based engines, two-thirds of producer-to-broker traffic crosses AZs due to leader distribution.",[340,595,596],{},"Consumer optimizations: Follower fetch is enabled across all tests, eliminating inter-AZ consumer traffic.",[340,598,599],{},"Storage cost exclusions: This benchmark only evaluates streaming costs, assuming no long-term data retention.",[31,601,603],{"id":602},"inter-broker-replication-costs","Inter-Broker Replication Costs",[47,605,606],{},"Inter-broker (cross-AZ) replication is a major cost driver for data streaming engines:",[337,608,609,612,615],{},[340,610,611],{},"RedPanda: Inter-broker replication is not free, leading to substantial costs when data must be copied across multiple availability zones.",[340,613,614],{},"AWS MSK: Inter-broker replication is free, but MSK instance pricing is significantly higher (e.g., $3.264 per hour for kafka.m7g.8xlarge vs $1.306 per hour for an on-demand m7g.8xlarge). The storage price of MSK is $0.10 per GB-month which is significantly higher than st1, which costs $0.045 per GB-month. Even though replication is free, client-to-broker traffic still incurs inter-AZ charges.",[340,616,617],{},"Ursa: No inter-broker replication costs due to its leaderless architecture, eliminating inter-zone replication costs entirely.",[31,619,621],{"id":620},"zone-affinity-reducing-inter-az-costs","Zone Affinity: Reducing Inter-AZ Costs",[47,623,624],{},"We evaluated zone affinity mechanisms to further reduce inter-AZ data transfer costs.",[47,626,627],{},"Consumers:",[337,629,630],{},[340,631,632],{},"Follower fetch is enabled across all tests, ensuring consumers fetch data from replicas in their local AZ—eliminating inter-zone consumer traffic except for metadata lookups",[47,634,635],{},"Producers:",[337,637,638,647,656],{},[340,639,640,641,646],{},"Kafka protocol lacks an easy way to enforce producer AZ affinity (though ",[54,642,645],{"href":643,"rel":644},"https:\u002F\u002Fcwiki.apache.org\u002Fconfluence\u002Fdisplay\u002FKAFKA\u002FKIP-1123:+Rack-aware+partitioning+for+Kafka+Producer",[263],"KIP-1123"," aims to address this). And it only works with the default partitioner (i.e., when no record partition or record key is specified).",[340,648,649,650,655],{},"Redpanda recently introduced ",[54,651,654],{"href":652,"rel":653},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.redpanda.com\u002Fredpanda-cloud\u002Fdevelop\u002Fproduce-data\u002Fleader-pinning\u002F",[263],"leader pinning",", but this only benefits setups where producers are confined to a single AZ—not applicable to our multi-AZ benchmark.",[340,657,658,659,664],{},"Ursa is the only system in this test with ",[54,660,663],{"href":661,"rel":662},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.streamnative.io\u002Fdocs\u002Fconfig-kafka-client#eliminate-cross-az-networking-traffic",[263],"built-in zone affinity for both producers and consumers",". It achieves this by embedding producer AZ information in client.id, allowing metadata lookups to route clients to local-AZ brokers, eliminating inter-AZ producer traffic.",[31,666,668],{"id":667},"cost-comparison-results","Cost Comparison Results",[47,670,335],{},[337,672,673,675],{},[340,674,342],{},[340,676,345],{},[47,678,679],{},"Ursa’s leaderless architecture, zone affinity, and native cloud storage integration deliver unparalleled cost efficiency, making it the most cost-effective choice for high-throughput data streaming workloads.",[47,681,682],{},[349,683],{"alt":17,"src":684},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c72208198ca36a352f228_AD_4nXeeZuM8T-xBlD4Vf3j67K618n08qh8wIDLLtiLJG0ssA1Wj1V26u7wIDTX9sqLrtw8mB2c299dwzarGen62CG0Vh7nWstn5qbPGFcBaKJYEepTsLr5fHWv1U8uqbg8Y0UOK6fJ7.png",[47,686,687],{},[349,688],{"alt":17,"src":689},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c625978031f40229de484_AD_4nXdLkLLJ30KKr-_A_rN1j8akVwBYacAWIPzWHoOReJF421890kfByZoQQxkLczihVSmiw5Q9J51-V9I2SEKITbwsYnANDDTlAVL5nQ_jfaHNTe9VEWhSoa7DZooCnilDYL6l6msmJg.png",[47,691,692],{},"The detailed infrastructure cost calculations for each data streaming engine are listed below:",[31,694,696],{"id":695},"streamnative-ursa","StreamNative - Ursa",[337,698,699,702,705,708],{},[340,700,701],{},"Server EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr = $14",[340,703,704],{},"Client EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr =$14",[340,706,707],{},"S3 write requests costs: 1350 r\u002Fs * $0.005\u002F1000r * 3600s = $24",[340,709,710],{},"S3 read requests costs: 1350 r\u002Fs * $0.0004\u002F1000r * 3600s = $2",[31,712,714],{"id":713},"aws-msk","AWS MSK",[337,716,717,720,723],{},[340,718,719],{},"Server EC2 costs: 15 * $3.264\u002Fhr = $49",[340,721,722],{},"Client side EC2 costs: 9 * $1.536\u002Fhr =$14",[340,724,725],{},"Interzone traffic - producer to broker: 5GB\u002Fs * ⅔ * $0.02\u002FG(in+out) * 3600 = $240",[31,727,729],{"id":728},"redpanda","RedPanda",[337,731,732,734,736,739,742],{},[340,733,701],{},[340,735,704],{},[340,737,738],{},"Interzone traffic - producer to broker: 5GB\u002Fs * ⅔ * $0.02\u002FGB(in+out) * 3600 = $240",[340,740,741],{},"Interzone traffic - replication: 10GB\u002Fs * $0.02\u002FGB(in+out) * 3600 = $720",[340,743,744],{},"Interzone traffic - broker to consumer: $0 (fetch from local zone)",[47,746,747,748,753],{},"Please note that we were unable to test ",[54,749,752],{"href":750,"rel":751},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.redpanda.com\u002Fblog\u002Fcloud-topics-streaming-data-object-storage",[263],"Redpanda with Cloud Topics",", as it remains an announced but unreleased feature and is not yet available for evaluation. Based on the limited information available, while Cloud Topics may help optimize inter-zone data replication costs, producers still need to traverse inter-availability zones to connect to the topic partition owners and incur inter-zone traffic costs of up to $240 per hour.",[337,755,756,762],{},[340,757,758,761],{},[54,759,645],{"href":643,"rel":760},[263]," (when implemented) will help mitigate producer-to-broker inter-zone traffic, but it is not yet available. And it only works with the default partitioner (no record partition or key is specified).",[340,763,764],{},"Redpanda’s leader pinning helps only when all producers for the pinned topic are confined to a single AZ. In multi-AZ environments (like our benchmark), inter-zone producer traffic remains unavoidable.",[47,766,767],{},"Additionally, Redpanda’s Cloud Topics architecture is not documented publicly. Their blog mentions \"leader placement rules to optimize produce latency and ingress cost,\" but it is unclear whether this represents a shift away from a leader-based architecture or if it uses techniques similar to Ursa’s zone-aware approach.",[47,769,770],{},"We may revisit this comparison as more details become available.",[39,772,774],{"id":773},"comparing-total-cost-of-ownership","Comparing Total Cost of Ownership",[47,776,777],{},"As highlighted earlier, with a BYOC Ursa setup, you can achieve 5 GB\u002Fs throughput at just 5% of the infrastructure cost of a traditional leader-based data streaming engine, such as Kafka or RedPanda, while managing the infrastructure yourself. This significant cost reduction is enabled by Ursa’s leaderless architecture and lakehouse-native storage design, which eliminate overhead costs such as inter-zone traffic and leader-based data replication. By leveraging a lakehouse-native, leaderless architecture, Ursa reduces resource requirements, enabling you to handle high data throughput efficiently and at a fraction of the cost of RedPanda.",[47,779,780],{},"Now, let’s examine the total cost comparison, evaluating Ursa alongside other vendors, including those that have adopted a leaderless architecture (e.g., Confluent WarpStream). This comparison is based on a 5GB\u002Fs workload with a 7-day retention period, factoring in both storage cost and vendor costs Here are the key findings:",[337,782,783,786,789],{},[340,784,785],{},"Ursa ($164,353\u002Fmonth) is: 50% cheaper than Confluent WarpStream ($337,068\u002Fmonth)",[340,787,788],{},"85% cheaper than AWS MSK ($1,115,251\u002Fmonth)",[340,790,791],{},"86% cheaper than Redpanda ($1,202,853\u002Fmonth)",[47,793,794],{},"In addition to Ursa’s architectural advantages—eliminating most inter-AZ traffic and leveraging lakehouse storage for cost-effective data retention—it also adopts a more fair and cost-efficient pricing model: Elastic Throughput-based pricing. This approach aligns costs with actual usage, avoiding unnecessary overhead.",[47,796,797],{},"Unlike WarpStream, which charges for both storage and throughput, Ursa ensures that customers only pay for the throughput they actively use. Ursa’s pricing is based on compressed data sent by clients, meaning the more data compressed on the client side, the lower the cost. In contrast, WarpStream prices are based on uncompressed data, unfairly inflating expenses and failing to incentivize customers to optimize their client applications.",[47,799,800],{},"This distinction is crucial, as compressed data reduces both storage and network costs, making Ursa’s pricing model not only more cost-effective but also more transparent and predictable.",[47,802,803],{},[349,804],{"alt":17,"src":805},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d194800c9206d9d58_AD_4nXcFlf755xgyz7htxhMhBV5fGrsxy642mQNodt61DTok_z1dwkw5A6lkO5hatXVneCaB0anbZPAyvLI3MlIMuQEYLEACHHvQMOr5UfaB37dfzkdqewDEvcT-20VGd_zzvJsuA00zGA.png",[47,807,808],{},[349,809],{"alt":17,"src":810},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c62594e9c2e629fae73aa_AD_4nXeU6cOgItnjLsEZCOf13TEvMY_SHWWIxYP2OYUj-B1GUPyWO78OG08K_v03hwYSVcg06f9dqDiGmdwy76vynjmiDGL5bluZ5_XF4nSU_r59oOZdfViXndXt6s11vVOY7qwfZN8v.png",[31,812,814],{"id":813},"cost-breakdown","Cost Breakdown",[816,817,818],"h4",{"id":695},"StreamNative – Ursa",[337,820,821,824,827,830,833],{},[340,822,823],{},"EC2 (Server): 9 × $1.536\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $9,953.28",[340,825,826],{},"S3 Write Requests: 1,350 r\u002Fs × $0.005\u002F1,000 r × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $17,496",[340,828,829],{},"S3 Read Requests: 1,350 r\u002Fs × $0.0004\u002F1,000 r × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $1,400",[340,831,832],{},"S3 Storage Costs: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.021\u002FGB × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days = $63,504",[340,834,835],{},"Vendor Cost: 200 ETU × $0.50\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $72,000",[816,837,839],{"id":838},"warpstream","WarpStream",[337,841,842,845],{},[340,843,844],{},"Based on WarpStream’s pricing calculator (as of January 29, 2025), we assume a 4:1 client data compression ratio, meaning 20 GB\u002Fs of uncompressed data translates to 5 GB\u002Fs of compressed data.",[340,846,847,848,853],{},"It's important to note that WarpStream’s pricing structure has fluctuated frequently throughout January. We observed the cost reported by their calculator changing from $409,644 per month to $337,068 per month. This variability has been previously highlighted in the blog post “",[54,849,852],{"href":850,"rel":851},"https:\u002F\u002Fbigdata.2minutestreaming.com\u002Fp\u002Fthe-brutal-truth-about-apache-kafka-cost-calculators",[263],"The Brutal Truth About Kafka Cost Calculators","”. To ensure transparency, we have documented the pricing as of January 29, 2025.",[47,855,856],{},[349,857],{"alt":17,"src":858},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602e42713e0028e9af5e_AD_4nXcu5_VWTLu9jRYs6zX1MBAOtLQEo5gyfNSWPcbpnQHXTa8qNCFAXezRR2E8daygzYTTwd4dhJjaLaLM8C6y_3OGbu2NS7pdvEv3a8-ptNKOg7AeKnYqPQCAYvQ5EuxzuI3JYIvY.png",[816,860,862],{"id":861},"msk","MSK",[337,864,865,868,871],{},[340,866,867],{},"EC2 (Server): 15 * $3.264\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $35,251",[340,869,870],{},"Interzone Traffic (Client-Server): 5 GB\u002Fs × ⅔ × $0.02\u002FGB (in+out) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $172,800",[340,872,873],{},"Storage: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.1\u002FGB-month × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days * 3 replicas = $907,200",[816,875,729],{"id":876},"redpanda-1",[337,878,879,882,884,887,890],{},[340,880,881],{},"EC2 (Server): 9 × $1.536\u002Fhr × 24 hr × 30 days = $9953",[340,883,870],{},[340,885,886],{},"Interzone Traffic (Replication): 5 GB\u002Fs × 2 × $0.02\u002FGB (in+out) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 30 days = $518,400",[340,888,889],{},"Storage: 5 GB\u002Fs × $0.045\u002FGB-month(st1) × 3,600 s × 24 hr × 7 days * 3 replicas = $408,240",[340,891,892],{},"Vendor Cost: $93,333 per month (based on limited information. See additional notes below).",[816,894,896],{"id":895},"additional-notes","Additional Notes",[337,898,899],{},[340,900,901,902,907],{},"Redpanda does not publicly disclose its BYOC pricing, making it difficult to accurately assess its total costs. We refer to information from the whitepaper “",[54,903,906],{"href":904,"rel":905},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.redpanda.com\u002Fresources\u002Fredpanda-vs-confluent-performance-tco-benchmark-report#form",[263],"Redpanda vs. Confluent: A Performance and TCO Benchmark Report by McKnight Consulting Group.","” for estimation purposes. Based on the Tier-8 pricing model in the whitepaper,  the estimated cost to support a 5GB\u002Fs workload would be $1.12 million per year ($93,333 per month). However, since this calculation is based on an estimation, we will revisit and refine the cost assessment once Redpanda publishes its BYOC pricing.",[47,909,910],{},[349,911],{"alt":17,"src":912},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602dc8a9859eed89a0ef_AD_4nXdbcO8vsNNPy4GtkNLlmNKf22fjxRvzLzH7CtOna1L08sTbvnZx3HhufeFqc1w4K2gEF7lxO2IR5supotxebAiGnA07Qa8Yr3Rd1pVK2LYKK4WurlJGwgdwwucZIFoF-N_2oBjY.png",[47,914,915],{},[349,916],{"alt":17,"src":917},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c602d6bc1c2287e012540_AD_4nXfcHZnLfjbjIr3ZAgoQXT9dwP3aQCOQPmGZZJUtpNZSwE6qY6M3yehIaBxCwxEIeu5PVdUPY0zhyjnow26YfgjdYgSG4GnV9ibxu0YWTIpwng6z_F6FUGJMpERMKtpsFESzXSN_Sw.png",[337,919,920,923],{},[340,921,922],{},"When estimating the storage costs for Kafka and Redpanda, we assume the use of HDD storage at $0.045\u002FGB, based on the premise that both systems can fully utilize disk bandwidth without incurring the higher costs associated with GP2 or GP3 volumes. However, in practice, many users opt for GP2 or GP3, significantly increasing the total storage cost for Kafka and Redpanda.",[340,924,925],{},"Unlike disk-based solutions, S3 storage does not require capacity preallocation—Ursa only incurs costs for the actual data stored. This contrasts with Kafka and Redpanda, where preallocating storage can drive up expenses. As a result, the real-world storage costs for Kafka and Redpanda are often 50% higher than the estimates above.",[39,927,929],{"id":928},"conclusion","Conclusion",[47,931,932],{},"Ursa represents a transformative shift in streaming data infrastructure, offering cost efficiency, scalability, and flexibility without compromising durability or reliability. By leveraging a leaderless architecture and eliminating inter-zone data replication, Ursa reduces total cost of ownership by over 90% compared to traditional leader-based streaming engines like Kafka and Redpanda. Its direct integration with cloud storage and scalable metadata & index management via Oxia ensure high availability and simplified infrastructure management.",[31,934,936],{"id":935},"balancing-latency-and-cost","Balancing Latency and Cost",[47,938,939,943],{},[54,940,942],{"href":941},"\u002Fblog\u002Fcap-theorem-for-data-streaming","Ursa trades off slightly higher latency for ultra low cost",", making it an ideal choice for the majority of streaming workloads, especially those that prioritize throughput and cost savings over ultra-low latency. Meanwhile, StreamNative’s BookKeeper-based engine remains the preferred solution for real-time, latency-sensitive applications. By combining these two approaches, StreamNative empowers customers with the flexibility to choose the right engine for their specific needs—whether it's maximizing cost savings or achieving ultra low-latency real-time performance.",[31,945,947],{"id":946},"the-future-of-streaming-infrastructure","The Future of Streaming Infrastructure",[47,949,950],{},"In an era where data fuels AI, analytics, and real-time decision-making, managing infrastructure costs is critical to sustaining innovation. Ursa is not just a cost-cutting alternative—it is a forward-thinking, lakehouse-native platform that redefines how modern data streaming infrastructure should be built and operated.",[47,952,953,954,959],{},"Whether your priority is reducing costs, improving flexibility, or ingesting massive data into lakehouses, Ursa delivers a future-proof solution for the evolving demands of real-time data streaming. ",[54,955,958],{"href":956,"rel":957},"https:\u002F\u002Fconsole.streamnative.cloud\u002F",[263],"Get started"," with StreamNative Ursa today!",[961,962,964],"h1",{"id":963},"references","References",[47,966,967,970,971],{},[968,969,428],"span",{}," ",[54,972,973],{"href":973},"\u002Fblog\u002Fintroducing-oxia-scalable-metadata-and-coordination",[47,975,976,970,978],{},[968,977,377],{},[54,979,376],{"href":376},[47,981,982,970,985],{},[968,983,984],{},"StreamNative pricing",[54,986,987],{"href":987,"rel":988},"https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.streamnative.io\u002Fdocs\u002Fbilling-overview",[263],[47,990,991,970,994],{},[968,992,993],{},"WarpStream pricing",[54,995,996],{"href":996,"rel":997},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.warpstream.com\u002Fpricing#pricingfaqs",[263],[47,999,1000,970,1003],{},[968,1001,1002],{},"AWS S3 pricing",[54,1004,1005],{"href":1005,"rel":1006},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Fs3\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1008,1009,970,1012],{},[968,1010,1011],{},"AWS EBS pricing",[54,1013,1014],{"href":1014,"rel":1015},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Febs\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1017,1018,970,1021],{},[968,1019,1020],{},"AWS MSK pricing",[54,1022,1023],{"href":1023,"rel":1024},"https:\u002F\u002Faws.amazon.com\u002Fmsk\u002Fpricing\u002F",[263],[47,1026,1027,970,1030],{},[968,1028,1029],{},"The Brutal Truth about Kafka Cost Calculators",[54,1031,850],{"href":850,"rel":1032},[263],[47,1034,1035,970,1038],{},[968,1036,1037],{},"Redpanda vs. Confluent: A Performance and TCO Benchmark Report by McKnight Consulting Group",[54,1039,904],{"href":904,"rel":1040},[263],{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1042},[1043,1044,1045,1050,1054,1055,1064,1067],{"id":331,"depth":18,"text":332},{"id":370,"depth":18,"text":371},{"id":395,"depth":18,"text":396,"children":1046},[1047,1048,1049],{"id":407,"depth":278,"text":408},{"id":432,"depth":278,"text":433},{"id":453,"depth":278,"text":454},{"id":477,"depth":18,"text":478,"children":1051},[1052,1053],{"id":481,"depth":278,"text":482},{"id":496,"depth":278,"text":497},{"id":537,"depth":18,"text":538},{"id":549,"depth":18,"text":550,"children":1056},[1057,1058,1059,1060,1061,1062,1063],{"id":556,"depth":278,"text":557},{"id":602,"depth":278,"text":603},{"id":620,"depth":278,"text":621},{"id":667,"depth":278,"text":668},{"id":695,"depth":278,"text":696},{"id":713,"depth":278,"text":714},{"id":728,"depth":278,"text":729},{"id":773,"depth":18,"text":774,"children":1065},[1066],{"id":813,"depth":278,"text":814},{"id":928,"depth":18,"text":929,"children":1068},[1069,1070],{"id":935,"depth":278,"text":936},{"id":946,"depth":278,"text":947},"StreamNative Cloud","2025-01-31","Discover how Ursa achieves 5GB\u002Fs Kafka workloads at just 5% of the cost of traditional streaming engines like Redpanda and AWS MSK. See our benchmark results comparing infrastructure costs, total cost of ownership (TCO), and performance across leading Kafka vendors.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F679c6593d25099b1cdcec4ca_image-31.png",{},"\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour","30 min",{"title":306,"description":1073},"blog\u002Fhow-we-run-a-5-gb-s-kafka-workload-for-just-50-per-hour",[1081,1082,301],"TCO","Apache Kafka","A0o_2xdJiLI6rf6xj4RKsxJNo_A6QN2fYzCp6gaLrFw",{"id":1085,"title":1086,"authors":1087,"body":1089,"category":1402,"createdAt":10,"date":1403,"description":1404,"extension":8,"featured":292,"image":1405,"isDraft":292,"link":10,"meta":1406,"navigation":7,"order":294,"path":1407,"readingTime":1408,"relatedResources":10,"seo":1409,"stem":1410,"tags":1411,"__hash__":1412},"blogs\u002Fblog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar.md","Deep Dive into Message Chunking in Pulsar",[1088],"Zike Yang",{"type":14,"value":1090,"toc":1387},[1091,1094,1097,1100,1103,1114,1118,1121,1125,1131,1135,1138,1141,1144,1147,1151,1154,1158,1161,1166,1169,1173,1186,1189,1193,1200,1211,1215,1218,1222,1225,1228,1237,1241,1244,1247,1256,1260,1263,1266,1269,1272,1275,1285,1288,1292,1295,1307,1316,1320,1334,1338,1346,1349,1384],[47,1092,1093],{},"Apache Pulsar™, like all messaging systems, imposes a size limit on each message sent to the broker. This prevents the payload of each message from exceeding the maxMessageSize set in the broker. The default value of the broker configuration maxMessageSize is 5 MB.",[47,1095,1096],{},"However, many users need the Pulsar client to send large messages to the broker for use cases such as image processing and audio processing. You can achieve this by adjusting the maxMessageSize; however, this approach can cause many problems. For example, if a client publishes a message of 100 MB and the broker allows storing this message into the bookie, then the bookie will spend too many resources on processing this message. This will impact other clients on publishing and cause backlog draining.",[47,1098,1099],{},"Therefore, instead of increasing the value of maxMessageSize, Pulsar provides a message chunking feature to enable sending large messages. With message chunking, the producer can split a large message into multiple chunks based on maxMessageSize and send each chunk to the broker as an ordinary message. The consumer then combines the chunks back to the original message.",[47,1101,1102],{},"In this blog, we will explain the concept of message chunking, deep dive into its implementation, and share best practices for this feature, including:",[337,1104,1105,1108,1111],{},[340,1106,1107],{},"How to use message chunking correctly.",[340,1109,1110],{},"Issues you may encounter when using chunk messages.",[340,1112,1113],{},"How to debug chunked messages.",[39,1115,1117],{"id":1116},"how-message-chunking-works","How Message Chunking Works",[47,1119,1120],{},"Message chunking is a process by which a large message can be split into multiple chunks for production and consumption. When using message chunking, you don’t need to worry about how Pulsar splits large messages and combines them or the detail of handling chunked messages. Pulsar does all of these things for you. In this section, let's look at how message chunking works in different scenarios.",[31,1122,1124],{"id":1123},"a-single-producer-publishes-chunked-messages-to-a-topic","A single producer publishes chunked messages to a topic",[47,1126,1127],{},[349,1128],{"alt":1129,"src":1130},"Splitting Chunked Messages","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14d3e6819ff036567df_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.25.49-am.png",[31,1132,1134],{"id":1133},"publishing-chunked-messages","Publishing Chunked Messages",[47,1136,1137],{},"Once the large message is split into chunks, the producer sends each chunk as an ordinary message to the broker. Each chunk is still subject to the flow control of the producer and the memory limiter of the client as if it were an ordinary message. There is a maxPendingMessages parameter in the producer configuration that limits the maximum number of messages the producer can publish concurrently. Each chunk is counted individually in maxPendingMessages. This means that sending a large message with three chunks will take up three messages in the producer for the pending message.",[47,1139,1140],{},"When sending each chunk, an individual OpSendMsg is created for each chunk. Each OpSendMsg shares the same ChunkMessageCtx that is used to return the chunked message ID to the user. Each chunk also shares the same uuid of the chunked message in its message metadata.",[47,1142,1143],{},"The producer sends each chunk to the broker in order, and the broker receives the chunks in order. This ensures that the entire chunked message is sent successfully when the publishing acknowledgment of the last chunk is received. This also ensures that all of the chunks of a chunked message are stored in the topic in order. The consumer relies on this ordering guarantee to consume the chunks in order.",[47,1145,1146],{},"Regarding a partitioned topic, the producer publishes all of the chunks of the same large message to the same partition.",[31,1148,1150],{"id":1149},"chunked-message-id","Chunked Message ID",[47,1152,1153],{},"In Pulsar, after an ordinary message is published or consumed, its message ID is returned to the user. For chunked messages, how does Pulsar return the message ID to the user?",[816,1155,1157],{"id":1156},"before-pulsar-2100","Before Pulsar 2.10.0",[47,1159,1160],{},"Before Pulsar 2.10.0, the producer or consumer only returns the message ID of the last chunk as the message ID of the entire chunked message. This implementation sometimes raises issues. For example, when we use this message ID to seek, the consumer will consume from the position of the last chunk. The consumer will mistakenly think the previous chunks are lost and choose to skip the current message. If we use inclusive seek, the consumer may skip the first message, which causes unexpected behavior.",[47,1162,1163],{},[349,1164],{"alt":1157,"src":1165},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14d79950d580d8c90d7_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.26.22-am.png",[47,1167,1168],{},"As shown in the image above, the consumer returns the message of the last chunk as the message ID of the chunked message to the user. If the consumer uses this message ID to do an inclusive seek, in the broker's view, the consumer is seeking M1-C3. According to the semantics of inclusive seek, the first message consumed by the consumer after performing an inclusive seek should be the message of the current seek position. So the first message to be consumed by the consumer after the seek is supposed to be message M1. But in fact, the first message that comes to the consumer is M1-C3. The consumer then discovers that it has not received the previous chunks of that chunked message and cannot continue to receive the previous chunks, so it will discard M1. Therefore, the first message consumed is actually M2. This is an unexpected behavior.",[816,1170,1172],{"id":1171},"introducing-chunk-message-id-in-pulsar-2100","Introducing Chunk Message ID in Pulsar 2.10.0",[47,1174,1175,1176,1181,1182,1185],{},"To solve this issue, Pulsar introduced the feature of chunk message ID in version 2.10.0. Issue ",[54,1177,1180],{"href":1178,"rel":1179},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fissues\u002F12402",[263],"PIP 107"," details the proposal of this feature. The chunk message ID is consistent with the original behavior to achieve compatibility with the original logic. It contains two ordinary message IDs: the message ID of the first chunk and the one of the last chunk. Both the producer and the consumer use chunked message context to generate the chunked message ID.\n",[349,1183],{"alt":17,"src":1184},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14d33ad8cbc3a7be3e7_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.27.03-am.png","\nAs shown in the figure above, the producer gets the message ID of the first chunk (corresponding to “first chunk mid”) and the message ID of the last chunk while receiving the publishing acknowledgment of each chunk. The producer buffers them in the chunked message context and generates the chunk message ID after receiving the last chunked message ID. The same is true for the consumer. The difference is that the consumer gets the message ID by receiving the message.",[47,1187,1188],{},"The chunk message ID feature not only fixes the issues caused by seeking, but also allows you to get more information about the chunked message.",[31,1190,1192],{"id":1191},"combining-chunks","Combining Chunks",[47,1194,1195,1196,1199],{},"The consumer needs to combine all of the chunks into the original message before returning it to the application. The consumer uses the chunked message context to buffer all the chunk data, such as payload, metadata, and message ID. When processing chunked messages, the consumer assumes that the chunks are received in order and will discard the whole chunked message if the received chunks are out of order.\n",[349,1197],{"alt":17,"src":1198},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14d788d5d75f421f28b_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.27.33-am.png","\nSuppose we have published two large messages, “abc” and “de,” as shown in the image above. They are waiting to be consumed on the topic. The maxMessageSize for the broker is set too small (just 1 byte), resulting in a small payload size in every chunk.",[47,1201,1202,1203,1206,1207,1210],{},"When the consumer consumes the first message, it finds the message to be a chunked message and creates a ChunkedMessageCtx. (We did not list all of the fields in the chunked message context in the example above.) The uuid uniquely identifies the chunked message so that we can know in which context the chunk should be placed. The lastChunkedMessageId in the context means the chunked ID of the last received chunk. It will be updated whenever the consumer receives a new chunk. The payload of the context is the payload of the entire chunked message currently buffered. It will keep growing as the consumer receives more chunks.\n",[349,1204],{"alt":17,"src":1205},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14d3e68191146656859_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.28.10-am.png","\nOnce the consumer receives all the chunks of the message with the uuid of uuid1, it can use the chunked message context to generate the original message. The complete message is then returned to the application and the consumer releases that context. Note that because we have received a chunk of message uuid2 during this process, a second chunked message context is created in the consumer.\n",[349,1208],{"alt":17,"src":1209},"\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63b3f14de4af5c198bc1e4df_screen-shot-2022-05-10-at-9.28.51-am.png","\nJust like the previous example, when the consumer receives all of the chunks of uuid2, it generates a new message from the chunked message context and returns the complete message to the application.",[39,1212,1214],{"id":1213},"best-practices-for-message-chunking","Best Practices for Message Chunking",[47,1216,1217],{},"In this section, we share some best practices for using message chunking.",[39,1219,1221],{"id":1220},"dont-use-large-message-metadata","Don’t use large message metadata",[47,1223,1224],{},"It is not recommended to set very large message metadata in chunked messages. The producer often publishes chunks with the maximum payload size. In the process of writing a chunk to a bookie, if the header part (which includes the message metadata) of the chunk exceeds 10 KB (the padding max frame size for a bookie), there will be an error.",[47,1226,1227],{},"The maxMessageSize limits the size of the payload for each message from the client to the broker, but it doesn't count the size of the header. In BookKeeper, there is a similar setting called nettyMaxFrameSizeBytes that limits the size of writing to each message. Any message sent to the BookKeeper larger than nettyMaxFrameSizeBytes will be rejected. In BookKeeper, the message size calculation includes the message header and payload. There are differences in the way the BookKeeper and the broker calculate maxMessageSize. As a result, the broker will reserve some padding size for the message's header, and the value is 10 KB (which is defined in Commands.MESSAGE_SIZE_FRAME_PADDING). The broker will set nettyMaxFrameSizeBytes to maxMessageSize plus 10 KB when establishing a connection with the BookKeeper.",[47,1229,1230,1231,1236],{},"For this reason, you need to ensure the size of the message header does not exceed 10 KB when sending large messages. You should also not exceed this limit when setting values of the key and other properties of large messages. There has been a ",[54,1232,1235],{"href":1233,"rel":1234},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fissues\u002F13591",[263],"new proposal"," to lift this limitation by including the header part on the client-side when splitting the message.",[39,1238,1240],{"id":1239},"topic-level-maxmessagesize-restriction","Topic level maxMessageSize restriction",[47,1242,1243],{},"It is not recommended to set the topic level maxMessageSize for a topic if you want to publish chunked messages to that topic.",[47,1245,1246],{},"The topic level maxMessageSize was introduced in Pulsar 2.7.1, and it can cause some problems when message chunking is enabled. As mentioned above, the chunked message splitting uses broker level maxMessageSize as the chunk size. In most use cases, the topic level maxMessageSize is always less or equal to the broker level maxMessageSize. In this case, publishing a chunked message will be rejected by the broker. Because the payload size of some chunks in this message will reach the broker level maxMessageSize and exceed topic level maxMessageSize, causing the broker to reject it. In addition, the broker calculates the header and payload together when checking whether the message exceeds the topic level maxMessageSize. Therefore, when we use the chunked message feature, you should be careful not to set the topic level maxMessageSize on that topic.",[47,1248,1249,1250,1255],{},"A fix to this known issue has been released in Pulsar 2.10. The topic level maxMessageSize check for chunked messages is removed. Upgrade your Pulsar version to 2.10 to get this fix. Read ",[54,1251,1254],{"href":1252,"rel":1253},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fissues\u002F13544",[263],"PIP-131"," to learn more.",[39,1257,1259],{"id":1258},"best-practices-for-the-consumer","Best practices for the consumer",[47,1261,1262],{},"You can use maxPendingChunkedMessage, expireTimeOfIncompleteChunkedMessage, and autoAckOldestChunkedMessageOnQueueFull in the consumer configuration to control the memory used in the consumer for chunked messages.",[47,1264,1265],{},"The chunked message contexts are buffered in the client’s memory. As the consumer creates more context, it may take up too much memory and lead to an out-of-memory error. Therefore, Pulsar introduced maxPendingChunkedMessage in the consumer configuration. It limits the maximum number of chunked message contexts that a consumer can maintain concurrently.",[47,1267,1268],{},"In addition, you can also set the expiration time of the chunked message context by setting the expireTimeOfIncompleteChunkedMessage in the consumer configuration. If the producer fails to publish all of the chunks of a message, resulting in the consumer unable to receive all of the chunks with the expiration time, the consumer will then expire incomplete chunks. The default value is one minute.",[47,1270,1271],{},"You can also delete the oldest context when the maximum number of pending chunked messages has reached the context is expired using a setting called autoAckOldestChunkedMessageOnQueueFull. If the setting is set to true, the consumer will drop the chunked message context that you want to delete by silently acknowledging it; if not, the consumer will mark the message for redelivery.",[47,1273,1274],{},"Below is an example of how to configure message chunking on the consumer.",[1276,1277,1282],"pre",{"className":1278,"code":1280,"language":1281},[1279],"language-text","Consumer consumer = client.newConsumer()\n        .topic(topic)\n        .subscriptionName(\"test\")\n        .autoAckOldestChunkedMessageOnQueueFull(true)\n        .maxPendingChunkedMessage(100)\n        .expireTimeOfIncompleteChunkedMessage(10, TimeUnit.MINUTES)\n        .subscribe();\n","text",[1283,1284,1280],"code",{"__ignoreMap":17},[47,1286,1287],{},"It is also not recommended to publish chunked messages that are too large as it can lead to high memory usage on the consumer side. Although the consumer can limit the number of chunked messages that can be buffered at the same time, there is no easy way to control the amount of memory used by buffered chunked messages.",[39,1289,1291],{"id":1290},"best-practices-for-debugging","Best practices for debugging",[47,1293,1294],{},"In the broker, you can debug message chunking by checking certain stats in a topic. Below are three commonly used ones:",[1296,1297,1298,1301,1304],"ol",{},[340,1299,1300],{},"msgChunkPublished: A boolean type. It shows whether this topic has a chunked message published on it.",[340,1302,1303],{},"​​chunkedMessageRate in publishers: It shows the total count of chunked messages received for this producer on this topic.",[340,1305,1306],{},"chunkedMessageRate in subscriptions and consumers: It tells you the chunked message dispatch rate in the subscription or the consumer.",[47,1308,1309,1310,1315],{},"Read ",[54,1311,1314],{"href":1312,"rel":1313},"https:\u002F\u002Fpulsar.apache.org\u002Fdocs\u002Fen\u002Fadmin-api-topics\u002F#get-stats",[263],"Manage Topics"," in the Pulsar documentation to learn more.",[39,1317,1319],{"id":1318},"upgrade-your-pulsar-version","Upgrade your Pulsar version",[47,1321,1322,1323,1328,1329,189],{},"It’s best to keep your Pulsar version up to date as the Pulsar community continues to optimize message chunking. We recommend updating your Pulsar version to 2.10 or later. There are important bug fixes for message chunking, such as ",[54,1324,1327],{"href":1325,"rel":1326},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F13454",[263],"fixing memory leak with the flow control of chunked messages"," and ",[54,1330,1333],{"href":1331,"rel":1332},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F12403",[263],"fixing the issue with seeking chunked messages",[39,1335,1337],{"id":1336},"more-resources","More Resources",[47,1339,1340,1341,189],{},"If you have any better ideas or encounter any issues when using message chunking, please feel free to create an issue in the ",[54,1342,1345],{"href":1343,"rel":1344},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fissues",[263],"Pulsar repo",[47,1347,1348],{},"You can find more details about the message chunking implementation in the following links:",[337,1350,1351,1358,1368,1374],{},[340,1352,1353],{},[54,1354,1357],{"href":1355,"rel":1356},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fwiki\u002FPIP-37:-Large-message-size-handling-in-Pulsar",[263],"PIP 37: Large message size handling in Pulsar",[340,1359,1360],{},[54,1361,1363,1364,1367],{"href":1362},"%5Bhttps:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F4400%5D(https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F4400)","PR: PIP 37: ",[968,1365,1366],{},"Pulsar-client"," support large message size",[340,1369,1370],{},[54,1371,1373],{"href":1178,"rel":1372},[263],"PIP 107: Introduce the chunk message ID",[340,1375,1376],{},[54,1377,1379,1380,1383],{"href":1378},"%5Bhttps:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F12403%5D(https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fapache\u002Fpulsar\u002Fpull\u002F12403)","PR: [PIP 107]",[968,1381,1382],{},"Client"," Introduce chunk message ID",[47,1385,1386],{},"‍",{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1388},[1389,1395,1396,1397,1398,1399,1400,1401],{"id":1116,"depth":18,"text":1117,"children":1390},[1391,1392,1393,1394],{"id":1123,"depth":278,"text":1124},{"id":1133,"depth":278,"text":1134},{"id":1149,"depth":278,"text":1150},{"id":1191,"depth":278,"text":1192},{"id":1213,"depth":18,"text":1214},{"id":1220,"depth":18,"text":1221},{"id":1239,"depth":18,"text":1240},{"id":1258,"depth":18,"text":1259},{"id":1290,"depth":18,"text":1291},{"id":1318,"depth":18,"text":1319},{"id":1336,"depth":18,"text":1337},"Apache Pulsar","2022-05-10","Learn about how message chunking works in Pulsar and the best practices for this feature.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fblogs\u002F63c7fa6e403da9ab01a37dbe_63b3f0d7e1511bdb30846ca2_content-blog-banner-image.png",{},"\u002Fblog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar","6 min read",{"title":1086,"description":1404},"blog\u002Fdeep-dive-into-message-chunking-in-pulsar",[1402],"lLfxx8a7xamTJqsijimNcyXpjKlf8dBfN4Jhd42Zuwg",[1414],{"id":1415,"title":1088,"bioSummary":1416,"email":10,"extension":8,"image":1417,"linkedinUrl":10,"meta":1418,"position":10,"stem":1425,"twitterUrl":10,"__hash__":1426},"authors\u002Fauthors\u002Fzike-yang.md","Zike Yang is a Platform Engineer at StreamNative, where he focuses on the next-generation Ursa engine, messaging services, and connectors. As an Apache Pulsar committer and PMC member, he also specializes in advancing Pulsar messaging, Pulsar clients, and Pulsar IO.","\u002Fimgs\u002Fauthors\u002Fzike-yang.webp",{"body":1419},{"type":14,"value":1420,"toc":1423},[1421],[47,1422,1416],{},{"title":17,"searchDepth":18,"depth":18,"links":1424},[],"authors\u002Fzike-yang","YAHBbBWfkc3V-QfyZQtAas4WshDMt2fPsrjME5k156s",[1428,1436,1443],{"path":1429,"title":1430,"date":1431,"image":1432,"link":-1,"collection":1433,"resourceType":1434,"score":1435,"id":1429},"\u002Fsuccess-stories\u002Fgetui","Build a Priority-based Push Notification System Using Apache Pulsar at GeTui","2022-12-27","\u002Fimgs\u002Fsuccess-stories\u002F67942ee3c017499ff6794b64_SN-SuccessStories-GeTui.webp","successStories","Case Study",1.1,{"path":1437,"title":1438,"date":1439,"image":1440,"link":-1,"collection":1441,"resourceType":1442,"score":1435,"id":1437},"\u002Fwebinars\u002Fhow-to-operate-pulsar-in-production","How to Operate Pulsar in Production","2022-12-23","\u002Fimgs\u002Fwebinars\u002F63a5a1346ac3009373b5c4c0_OG_webinar-How%20to%20Operate%20Pulsar%20in%20Production.webp","webinars","Webinar",{"path":1444,"title":1445,"date":1439,"image":1446,"link":-1,"collection":1441,"resourceType":1442,"score":1435,"id":1444},"\u002Fwebinars\u002Flessons-from-managing-a-pulsar-cluster-by-nutanix","Lessons From Managing A Pulsar Cluster by Nutanix","\u002Fimgs\u002Fwebinars\u002F63a59f3960075d23d546447c_OG_webinar-Lessons%20From%20Managing%20A%20Pulsar%20Cluster%20by%20Nutanix.webp",1775235686929]